Comparison Overview

New York Blood Center

VS

Cedars-Sinai

New York Blood Center

310 East 67th Street, New York, NY, US, 10065
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.nybloodcenter.org

Founded in 1964, New York Blood Center (NYBC) is a nonprofit organization that is one of the largest independent, community-based blood centers in the world. NYBC, along with its partner organizations Community Blood Center of Kansas City, Missouri (CBC), Innovative Blood Resources (IBR), Blood Bank of Delmarva (BBD), and Rhode Island Blood Center (RIBC), collect approximately 4,000 units of blood products each day and serve local communities of more than 45 million people in the Tri-State area (NY, NJ, CT), Mid Atlantic area (PA, DE, MD), the Kansas City metropolitan area, Minnesota, Nebraska, Rhode Island, and Southern New England. NYBC and its partners also provide a wide array of transfusion-related medical services, including Comprehensive Cell Solutions, the National Center for Blood Group Genomics, the National Cord Blood Program, and the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, which — among other milestones — developed the Hepatitis B vaccine and a patented solvent detergent plasma process innovating blood-purification technology worldwide.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,051
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Cedars-Sinai

8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, US, 90048
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.cshs.org/

Since its beginning in 1902, Cedars-Sinai has evolved to meet the healthcare needs of one of the most diverse regions in the nation, continually setting new standards for quality and innovation in patient care, research, teaching and community service. Today, Cedars-Sinai is widely known for its national leadership in transforming healthcare for the benefit of patients. Cedars-Sinai receives consistent recognition for our excellence. Our awards include; being named one of America’s Best Hospitals by U.S. News & World Report, receiving the National Research Corporation’s Consumer Choice Award 19 years in a row for providing the highest-quality medical care in Los Angeles, achieving the longest-running Magnet designation for nursing excellence in California, and being recognized as The Advisory Board Company’s 2017 Workplace of the Year, an award Cedars-Sinai has won three years in a row. This annual award recognizes hospitals and health systems nationwide that have outstanding levels of employee engagement. Cedars-Sinai is a leader in the clinical care and research of heart disease, cancer and brain disorders, among other areas. Pioneering research achievements include using cardiac stem cells to repair damaged hearts, developing minimally invasive surgical techniques and discovering new types of drugs to target cancer more precisely. Cedars-Sinai also impacts the future of healthcare through education programs that encompass everything from highly competitive medical residency and fellowship programs to a biomedical science and translational medicine PhD program, advanced training for nurses and educational opportunities for allied health professionals. Most notably, Cedars-Sinai demonstrates a longstanding commitment to strengthening the Los Angeles community through wide-ranging programs that improve the health of its most vulnerable residents.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,316
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-blood-center.jpeg
New York Blood Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedars-sinai-medical-center.jpeg
Cedars-Sinai
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New York Blood Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cedars-Sinai
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York Blood Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedars-Sinai in 2026.

Incident History — New York Blood Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York Blood Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cedars-Sinai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedars-Sinai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-blood-center.jpeg
New York Blood Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedars-sinai-medical-center.jpeg
Cedars-Sinai
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Laptop
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cedars-Sinai company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York Blood Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

New York Blood Center company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Cedars-Sinai company.

In the current year, Cedars-Sinai company and New York Blood Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

New York Blood Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Cedars-Sinai company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Cedars-Sinai company and New York Blood Center company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Cedars-Sinai company nor New York Blood Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New York Blood Center company nor Cedars-Sinai company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cedars-Sinai company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to New York Blood Center company.

Cedars-Sinai company employs more people globally than New York Blood Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor Cedars-Sinai holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References