Comparison Overview

New Policy Institute

VS

Instituto Res Publica

New Policy Institute

Oxford House, London, undefined, E2 6HG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

The New Policy Institute (NPI) is a British think tank based in London. NPI was founded in 1996 with a mission of advancing social justice in a market economy. It conducts research and consultancy work across a range of economic and social policy areas including poverty, social security, housing, and economics.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Instituto Res Publica

Holanda Int. 331, Santiago, Providencia, CL
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Res Publica es una institución que promueve el interés por los problemas sociales y políticos de Chile, con un sentido de compromiso personal, valoración de la persona, responsabilidad por el destino del país y solidaridad en el ejercicio de las propias tareas. Res Publica estima que Chile es un país de un potencial inmenso, basado tanto en su gente como en la riqueza de su territorio y su desarrollo a través del tiempo. Por lo mismo, espera ser un canal de formación de jóvenes, discusión racional de los temas públicos en un ambiente de amistad cívica republicana y la convicción de que el ejercicio de la libertad y la responsabilidad personal tienen un profundo impacto positivo en la sociedad.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-policy-institute.jpeg
New Policy Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instituto-res-publica.jpeg
Instituto Res Publica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New Policy Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Instituto Res Publica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Policy Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instituto Res Publica in 2025.

Incident History — New Policy Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Policy Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Instituto Res Publica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instituto Res Publica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-policy-institute.jpeg
New Policy Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instituto-res-publica.jpeg
Instituto Res Publica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Instituto Res Publica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New Policy Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Instituto Res Publica company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New Policy Institute company.

In the current year, Instituto Res Publica company and New Policy Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Instituto Res Publica company nor New Policy Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Instituto Res Publica company nor New Policy Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Instituto Res Publica company nor New Policy Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New Policy Institute company nor Instituto Res Publica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New Policy Institute company nor Instituto Res Publica company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Instituto Res Publica company employs more people globally than New Policy Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New Policy Institute nor Instituto Res Publica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X