Comparison Overview

New Orleans Museum of Art

VS

National WWI Museum and Memorial

New Orleans Museum of Art

1 Collins Diboll Circle, City Park, New Orleans, LA, US, 70179
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

New Orleans Museum of Art (NOMA), New Orleans’ oldest fine arts institution, opened on December 16, 1911 with only 9 works of art. Today, the museum hosts an impressive permanent collection of almost 40,000 objects. The collection, noted for its extraordinary strengths in French and American art, photography, glass, and African and Japanese works, continues to expand and grow, making NOMA one of the top art museums in the south. The five-acre Sydney and Walda Besthoff Sculpture Garden at NOMA is one of the most important sculpture installations in the United States, with over 60 sculptures situated on a beautifully landscaped site amongst meandering footpaths, reflecting lagoons, Spanish moss-laden 200-year-old live oaks, mature pines, magnolias, camellias, and pedestrian bridges.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National WWI Museum and Memorial

2 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, MO, US, 64108
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The National World War I Museum and Memorial is America's museum dedicated to remembering, interpreting and understanding the Great War and its enduring impact on the global community. The Museum operates as non-profit organization dedicated to honoring those who served in the Great War by: • Maintaining the Liberty Memorial as a beacon of freedom and a symbol of the courage, patriotism, sacrifice and honor of all who served in World War I • Interpreting the history of World War I to encourage public involvement and informed decision-making • Providing exhibitions and educational programs that engage diverse audiences • Collecting and preserving historical materials with the highest professional standards

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-orleans-museum-of-art.jpeg
New Orleans Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-wwi-museum.jpeg
National WWI Museum and Memorial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New Orleans Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National WWI Museum and Memorial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Orleans Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National WWI Museum and Memorial in 2026.

Incident History — New Orleans Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Orleans Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National WWI Museum and Memorial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National WWI Museum and Memorial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-orleans-museum-of-art.jpeg
New Orleans Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-wwi-museum.jpeg
National WWI Museum and Memorial
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New Orleans Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National WWI Museum and Memorial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National WWI Museum and Memorial company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New Orleans Museum of Art company.

In the current year, National WWI Museum and Memorial company and New Orleans Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National WWI Museum and Memorial company nor New Orleans Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National WWI Museum and Memorial company nor New Orleans Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National WWI Museum and Memorial company nor New Orleans Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art company nor National WWI Museum and Memorial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art company nor National WWI Museum and Memorial company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New Orleans Museum of Art company employs more people globally than National WWI Museum and Memorial company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art nor National WWI Museum and Memorial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H