Comparison Overview

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

VS

The Lit Platform

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

PO BOX 726, None, GREEN FOREST, Arkansas, US, 72638
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://newleafpublishinggroup.com

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP, INC is a Christian publishing company offering biblical homeschool curriculum as well as theology, creation science, and apologetics resources to help defend your faith. Since 1975, our mission has been "Ink on Paper to Touch Eternity." New Leaf Publishing Group, Inc. is the parent company of the Master Books, New Leaf Press, and Attic Books imprints. Homeschool families and Christian organizations rely on MasterBooks.com for K-12 curriculum and educational resources that defend a biblical worldview and six-day account of creation. New Leaf Press offers books to inspire your Christian faith. Attic Books provides Christian classics and unedited accounts of history that line up with the biblical timeline.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Lit Platform

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.theliteraryplatform.com

The Literary Platform is a specialist agency working at the heart of books and technology. In 2013 we were selected for the British Council Creative Economy’s list of Top Ten UK Creative Entrepreneurs, and for the Guardian Professional/h.Club 100 list of ‘most innovative and influential’ in the creative industries. In 2015 we were listed in the Fortuna 50 Index of the UK’s fastest growing female-led small businesses. We work with a wide range of clients on R&D, audience development and engagement, community building, content strategy, communications strategy, partnership brokering, event programming, organisational change, business development, data analysis and project management for digital publishing projects. We also work with academic institutions and other organisations on research projects looking at the impact of technology on writers and publishing, as well as conceiving and producing our own projects with funding from Arts Council England including the Jerwood Fiction Uncovered Prize and The Writing Platform. Our clients are book publishers, developers, literary organisations and festivals, conference organisers, retailers and think tanks and include the Royal Society of Literature, The Reading Agency, Heuristic Media, British Council, National Literacy Trust, Pan Macmillan, Faber & Faber, Random House, Simon & Schuster, Nesta and Hachette. You can read more about our recent projects in our Year Notes 2012 and Year Notes 2013. Our academic affiliations include Bath Spa University, Goldsmiths University, Queensland University of Technology Australia, Bournemouth University, UEA and London College of Communications.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-literary-platform.jpeg
The Lit Platform
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Lit Platform
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Lit Platform in 2025.

Incident History — NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Lit Platform (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Lit Platform cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-literary-platform.jpeg
The Lit Platform
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Lit Platform company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Lit Platform company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company.

In the current year, The Lit Platform company and NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Lit Platform company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Lit Platform company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Lit Platform company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor The Lit Platform company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor The Lit Platform company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company employs more people globally than The Lit Platform company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor The Lit Platform holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References