Comparison Overview

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

VS

NEWSBTC

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

PO BOX 726, None, GREEN FOREST, Arkansas, US, 72638
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://newleafpublishinggroup.com

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP, INC is a Christian publishing company offering biblical homeschool curriculum as well as theology, creation science, and apologetics resources to help defend your faith. Since 1975, our mission has been "Ink on Paper to Touch Eternity." New Leaf Publishing Group, Inc. is the parent company of the Master Books, New Leaf Press, and Attic Books imprints. Homeschool families and Christian organizations rely on MasterBooks.com for K-12 curriculum and educational resources that defend a biblical worldview and six-day account of creation. New Leaf Press offers books to inspire your Christian faith. Attic Books provides Christian classics and unedited accounts of history that line up with the biblical timeline.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NEWSBTC

71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, United Kingdom, WC2H 9JQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
https://www.newsbtc.com/

NewsBTC, founded in October 2013, aims to publish useful news articles, interviews, and other pieces of information that help you better understand the bitcoin & cryptocurrency ecosystem. Our editorial vision is to deliver hard news and analysis — not speculation and rumors. There are many new innovations taking place in the field of cryptocurrencies every day and we strive to keep you up to date about the latest happenings from the space. We also cover Litecoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Ripple, Bitcoin Cash and a host of other digital assets in the cryptocurrency space.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newsbtc.jpeg
NEWSBTC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEWSBTC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEWSBTC in 2025.

Incident History — NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEWSBTC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEWSBTC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newsbtc.jpeg
NEWSBTC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NEWSBTC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NEWSBTC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company.

In the current year, NEWSBTC company and NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEWSBTC company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NEWSBTC company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NEWSBTC company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor NEWSBTC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor NEWSBTC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company employs more people globally than NEWSBTC company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor NEWSBTC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References