Comparison Overview

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

VS

Immortal Works

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

PO BOX 726, None, GREEN FOREST, Arkansas, US, 72638
Last Update: 2025-11-26

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP, INC is a Christian publishing company offering biblical homeschool curriculum as well as theology, creation science, and apologetics resources to help defend your faith. Since 1975, our mission has been "Ink on Paper to Touch Eternity." New Leaf Publishing Group, Inc. is the parent company of the Master Books, New Leaf Press, and Attic Books imprints. Homeschool families and Christian organizations rely on MasterBooks.com for K-12 curriculum and educational resources that defend a biblical worldview and six-day account of creation. New Leaf Press offers books to inspire your Christian faith. Attic Books provides Christian classics and unedited accounts of history that line up with the biblical timeline.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Immortal Works

PO Box 25492, Salt Lake CIty, 84125, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are a full-service small press that specializes in genre fiction for those looking for an enthralling tale, but don’t want to have to worry about graphic violence, obscene language, or pornographic content. That doesn’t mean our titles don’t have dark villains, irreverent humor, or thrilling romance. It just means that you don’t have to hide our books from your mom, wife, and bishop. Immortal Works publishes mainstream genre fiction in print, as eBooks, and every one of our titles will be available on Audible!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/immortalworks.jpeg
Immortal Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Immortal Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Immortal Works in 2025.

Incident History — NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Immortal Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Immortal Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/immortalworks.jpeg
Immortal Works
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Immortal Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Immortal Works company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company.

In the current year, Immortal Works company and NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Immortal Works company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Immortal Works company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Immortal Works company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor Immortal Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor Immortal Works company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company employs more people globally than Immortal Works company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP nor Immortal Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.