Comparison Overview

Center for Aquatic Sciences

VS

Sharlot Hall Museum

Center for Aquatic Sciences

1 Riverside Drive, Camden, NJ, 08103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aquaticsciences.org

The Center for Aquatic Sciences provides unique learning experiences that empower youth to lead the way in understanding, appreciating, and protecting the environment. We believe that investing in young people, strengthening their connection to nature, and positioning them for success is our best hope for creating a better world for future generations. Our location at the confluence of the Cooper and Delaware Rivers and our long-standing partnership with Adventure Aquarium gives us a deep appreciation of the importance of water as a life-giving resource and the urgency of protecting aquatic life and habitats. We are committed to the Camden community and supporting our neighbors in their efforts to increase residents’ access to natural spaces and public waterways and advocate for environmental justice.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sharlot Hall Museum

415 W. Gurley Street, Prescott, Arizona, 86301, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sharlothallmuseum.org

The Sharlot Hall Museum, founded in 1928 by visionary Sharlot M. Hall, is an open-air museum in downtown Prescott, Arizona. The four-acre campus includes several historic buildings, including the 1864 Territorial Governor's Mansion, as well as expansive exhibits and gardens. Regular events and programs include the annual Prescott Indian Art Market, premier winetasting event Sharlot's WineFest, monthly Living History Adventures, a popular lecture series, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-jersey-academy-for-aquatic-sciences.jpeg
Center for Aquatic Sciences
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Aquatic Sciences
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sharlot Hall Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Aquatic Sciences in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharlot Hall Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Aquatic Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Aquatic Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sharlot Hall Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharlot Hall Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-jersey-academy-for-aquatic-sciences.jpeg
Center for Aquatic Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sharlot Hall Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Aquatic Sciences company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sharlot Hall Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Aquatic Sciences company.

In the current year, Sharlot Hall Museum company and Center for Aquatic Sciences company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Center for Aquatic Sciences company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Center for Aquatic Sciences company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Center for Aquatic Sciences company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Aquatic Sciences company employs more people globally than Sharlot Hall Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Aquatic Sciences nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References