Comparison Overview

New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd

VS

Maars Living Walls

New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd

No. 376 Jinshi Road Jinjiang Industrial Park, CHENGDU, SIC, 610063, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

New Hope Liuhe is a mechanical or industrial engineering company based out of BEIJING. New Hope Liuhe representatives, don’t miss out on opportunities to build relationships with members on LinkedIn. Claim your page, write a simple description, and share content to attract followers that can lead to new customers, brand fans, and future employees. Go here to get started: http://linkd.in/1DUpBvu

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Maars Living Walls

Newtonweg 1, Harderwijk, undefined, 3840 BA, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Maars is the world market leader in the field of partition walls. Maars combines years of experience by effortlessly merging special innovation, aesthetics and performance. Maars offers both standard and customized solutions in, for example, offices, airports, factories, cinemas, shops and hotels. Also in the public sector Maars has been active and has taken the lead with applications including hospitals, public institutions, universities and schools. Maars is continuously redefining partition walls. Better still, it develops partition walls that rise above all expectations. Maars reviews developments around the world with an open mind, looking for new ideas and opportunities. This leads to substantial inspiration and developments. Maars pushes the boundaries, continually making progress in the fields of design, soundproofing, multimedia and fireproofing. The integration of new high-tech systems and intelligent solutions in walls creates a wealth of new opportunities. Thus, Maars brings walls to life with the unique concept of Maars Living Walls. Maars is active in over 45 countries and has a worldwide network of selected dealers. Its headquarters and factory are located in Harderwijk but Maars also has subsidiaries in Germany, Switzerland , France , USA , Middle East and China. 70% of turnover is exported abroad. The international organization has all departments in-house: product development, production, installation and after sales. The highest quality and the best services are guaranteed.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-hope-liuhe-co-ltd.jpeg
New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maars-partitioning-systems.jpeg
Maars Living Walls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maars Living Walls
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maars Living Walls in 2025.

Incident History — New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maars Living Walls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maars Living Walls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-hope-liuhe-co-ltd.jpeg
New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maars-partitioning-systems.jpeg
Maars Living Walls
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maars Living Walls company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maars Living Walls company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company.

In the current year, Maars Living Walls company and New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maars Living Walls company nor New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maars Living Walls company nor New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maars Living Walls company nor New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company nor Maars Living Walls company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Maars Living Walls company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company.

New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd company employs more people globally than Maars Living Walls company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd nor Maars Living Walls holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H