Comparison Overview

New England Homes for the Deaf

VS

Trinity Terrace

New England Homes for the Deaf

154-160 Water Street, Danvers, Massachusetts, 01923, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

New England Homes for the Deaf (NEHD), founded in 1901, is a life plan community that offers continuum of care to Deaf, Deafblind and hard of hearing seniors, including independent living, rest home, skilled nursing community, Deaf senior centers, short-term rehabilitation services, respite care services and hospice care. The New England Homes for the Deaf mission is to provide long term healthcare, housing, recreational activities and social support for Deaf, Deafblind and hard of hearing individuals in an accessible, barrier-free and culturally-sensitive environment with optimal communication and architectural resources.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Trinity Terrace

1600 Texas Street, Fort Worth, 76102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Trinity Terrace is a not-for-profit Life Plan Community providing exceptional services and a secure, comfortable environment to enrich the lives of senior adults. Located in downtown Fort Worth beside the Trinity River and the cultural district, we offer an extensive range of amenities and services. Our expanding campus boasts fine dining, gardens, a chapel, a convenience store, a library, a 42,860 square foot state-of-the-art fitness and wellness center, and a wide selection of apartment styles, sizes, and floor plans. Our Health & Rehabilitation Center – which encompasses a Skilled Nursing Facility, Assisted Living, Memory Care, an in-house Home Health Agency, and Occupational, Physical, and Speech Therapy departments – has a five star rating from CMS. In 2015 we received an outstanding 97.4% score from the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF), the international agency that certifies our industry. With roots going back over a century, Trinity Terrace has been ranked BBB+ by Fitch Ratings, and is proud to be an affiliate of Pacific Retirement Services (www.retirement.org).

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-england-homes-for-the-deaf-inc-..jpeg
New England Homes for the Deaf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trinity-terrace-retirement-community.jpeg
Trinity Terrace
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New England Homes for the Deaf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trinity Terrace
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New England Homes for the Deaf in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trinity Terrace in 2025.

Incident History — New England Homes for the Deaf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New England Homes for the Deaf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trinity Terrace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trinity Terrace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-england-homes-for-the-deaf-inc-..jpeg
New England Homes for the Deaf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trinity-terrace-retirement-community.jpeg
Trinity Terrace
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New England Homes for the Deaf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trinity Terrace company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trinity Terrace company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New England Homes for the Deaf company.

In the current year, Trinity Terrace company and New England Homes for the Deaf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trinity Terrace company nor New England Homes for the Deaf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trinity Terrace company nor New England Homes for the Deaf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trinity Terrace company nor New England Homes for the Deaf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf company nor Trinity Terrace company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Trinity Terrace company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to New England Homes for the Deaf company.

Trinity Terrace company employs more people globally than New England Homes for the Deaf company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New England Homes for the Deaf nor Trinity Terrace holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N