Comparison Overview

New City Press

VS

Uitgeverij Podium

New City Press

202 Comforter Blvd, Hyde Park, New York, 12538, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newcitypress.com

We aspire to be the leading media platform for fostering a culture of unity, encounter, and dialogue. Our mission is to produce, aggregate, and distribute content that enhances spiritual growth and builds bridges across faith and cultural divides. In unity with the charism and ministry of the Focolare, we address issues important to faith communities and society through collaborative and mutually supportive relationships with our audiences, stakeholders, and strategic partners.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Uitgeverij Podium

Amsterdam, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uitgeverijpodium.nl

Uitgeverij Podium werd in 1997 opgericht door Joost Nijsen, mede mogelijk gemaakt door de loyaliteit van Nederlandse auteurs die hij eerder uitgaf bij Nijgh & Van Ditmar en Balans, zoals Herman Franke, Ronald Giphart, Nicolaas Klei, Manon Uphoff en Henk van Woerden. Podium is vanaf de oprichting een zelfstandige uitgeverij, gespecialiseerd in hedendaagse Nederlandse en vertaalde literatuur (proza, poëzie) en literaire en journalistieke non-fictie. Dankzij een selectieve fondsvorming en beheerste titelproductie, kan door het enthousiaste en deskundige team aan de uitgegeven titels veel zorg worden besteed, zowel aan redactie en productie als aan verkoop en marketing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-city-press.jpeg
New City Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverij-podium.jpeg
Uitgeverij Podium
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New City Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Uitgeverij Podium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New City Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Uitgeverij Podium in 2025.

Incident History — New City Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New City Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Uitgeverij Podium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Uitgeverij Podium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-city-press.jpeg
New City Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverij-podium.jpeg
Uitgeverij Podium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Uitgeverij Podium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New City Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Uitgeverij Podium company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New City Press company.

In the current year, Uitgeverij Podium company and New City Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium company nor New City Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium company nor New City Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Podium company nor New City Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New City Press company nor Uitgeverij Podium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New City Press company nor Uitgeverij Podium company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Uitgeverij Podium company employs more people globally than New City Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New City Press nor Uitgeverij Podium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References