Comparison Overview

New Bridge Strategy

VS

Independent Women's Forum

New Bridge Strategy

undefined, Denver, Colorado, 80403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

New Bridge Strategy is an opinion research company specializing in public policy and campaign research. Our roots are in Republican politics, but we have worked as members of bipartisan research teams and led coalitions across the political spectrum in crafting winning ballot measure campaigns, public education campaigns, and legislative policy efforts. We help our clients bridge divides to create winning majorities. New Bridge Strategy provides personalized attention that does not end when the research is completed. We are partners throughout the effort. We know how to make research actionable for our clients, so that they not only come away knowing where they start, but how to get to their ultimate goal – whether that is defeating a bad piece of legislation, winning a ballot proposal, or motivating voters to take a specific action on behalf of their cause.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Independent Women's Forum

1875 I Street NW | Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Independent Women's Forum is dedicated to developing and advancing policies that aren’t just well-intended, but actually enhance people’s freedom, choices, and opportunities. We work every day to engage and inform women and create a community to discuss how policy issues – including paid leave, health care, taxes, energy, minimum wage, and education – impact them and their loved ones. To keep informed of IWF media appearances, publications, and events, please sign up here: https://www.iwf.org/connect/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-bridge-strategy.jpeg
New Bridge Strategy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-women's-forum.jpeg
Independent Women's Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New Bridge Strategy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Independent Women's Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Bridge Strategy in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Independent Women's Forum in 2025.

Incident History — New Bridge Strategy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Bridge Strategy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Independent Women's Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Independent Women's Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-bridge-strategy.jpeg
New Bridge Strategy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-women's-forum.jpeg
Independent Women's Forum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Independent Women's Forum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New Bridge Strategy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Independent Women's Forum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New Bridge Strategy company.

In the current year, Independent Women's Forum company and New Bridge Strategy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor New Bridge Strategy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor New Bridge Strategy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor New Bridge Strategy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New Bridge Strategy company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New Bridge Strategy company nor Independent Women's Forum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Independent Women's Forum company employs more people globally than New Bridge Strategy company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New Bridge Strategy nor Independent Women's Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H