Comparison Overview

New Bridge Founders

VS

Pregnant Then Screwed

New Bridge Founders

Axel-Springer-Platz 3, Hamburg, undefined, 20355, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Our goal is to shape a positive future for the next generation. As a Think Tank, we develop hypotheses on how technology will impact society. We validate them by investing in companies that share our values. - We investigate the impact of different technologies on society, forming opinions on how they can be utilized to shape the future in the most positive way for society. - We provide inception capital and mentorship to companies that share our values of sustainable, long-term growth and fit our view on the future. - We provide the networks & tools that are needed to enable those companies to succeed on their mission.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pregnant Then Screwed

undefined, York, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Pregnant Then Screwed protects, supports and promotes the rights of mothers who suffer the effects of systemic, cultural, and institutional discrimination through our various schemes and activities, including: A free legal advice service, lobbying the Government for legislative change, and a mentor scheme that supports women who are considering legal action against their employer. As of January 2025, our work has been mentioned in parliament 138 times by cross party MPs. We have won multiple awards including Small Charity of the Year (Third Sector, 2023), Communications Campaign of The Year (Third Sector, 2023), Best Social Purpose Campaign (PR Week, 2023) and a Highly Commended trophy for In-House Team of The Year (PR Week, 2024). In October 2022 we organised the March of the Mummies, a national protest where 15,000 parents marched across 11 cities in the UK to demand Government reform of childcare, flexible working and parental leave. The march has been credited with triggering a national conversation about how the system is failing parents.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-bridge-founders.jpeg
New Bridge Founders
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pregnant-then-screwed.jpeg
Pregnant Then Screwed
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New Bridge Founders
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pregnant Then Screwed
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Bridge Founders in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pregnant Then Screwed in 2025.

Incident History — New Bridge Founders (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Bridge Founders cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pregnant Then Screwed (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pregnant Then Screwed cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-bridge-founders.jpeg
New Bridge Founders
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pregnant-then-screwed.jpeg
Pregnant Then Screwed
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pregnant Then Screwed company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New Bridge Founders company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pregnant Then Screwed company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New Bridge Founders company.

In the current year, Pregnant Then Screwed company and New Bridge Founders company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pregnant Then Screwed company nor New Bridge Founders company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pregnant Then Screwed company nor New Bridge Founders company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pregnant Then Screwed company nor New Bridge Founders company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New Bridge Founders company nor Pregnant Then Screwed company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New Bridge Founders company nor Pregnant Then Screwed company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pregnant Then Screwed company employs more people globally than New Bridge Founders company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New Bridge Founders nor Pregnant Then Screwed holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X