Comparison Overview

Nevada Policy

VS

Strata Policy

Nevada Policy

7130 Placid Street, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89119
Last Update: 2025-12-04

The Nevada Policy Research Institute fights for your personal right to be free from the constraints and abuses of an ever-growing crony government, by conducting fact-based research and grassroots education that holds government accountable and transparent to the very people it is designed to serve. As a 501(c)(3) organization, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, the Institute does not lobby for or against legislation, nor does it endorse or oppose political candidates. Visit NPRI.org to learn more.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Strata Policy

255 South Main Street, Logan, 84321, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Strata’s mission is to help people make informed decisions about issues that impact the freedom to live their lives. We work to achieve more prosperous and free societies by affecting a change in the climate of ideas. The following principles guide us on our path: Integrity: We are principled in all we do. Mutual Respect: We respect people and their ideas. Trust: We count on and support one another individually and as members of our team. Intellectual Curiosity: We seek out big ideas and explore new ways of thinking. Action: Our disposition is towards action and responsible initiative. Accountability: We accept responsibility for our actions, attitudes, and interactions.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nevada-policy.jpeg
Nevada Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strata-policy.jpeg
Strata Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nevada Policy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Strata Policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nevada Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strata Policy in 2025.

Incident History — Nevada Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nevada Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Strata Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strata Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nevada-policy.jpeg
Nevada Policy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strata-policy.jpeg
Strata Policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nevada Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Strata Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Strata Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nevada Policy company.

In the current year, Strata Policy company and Nevada Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Strata Policy company nor Nevada Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Strata Policy company nor Nevada Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Strata Policy company nor Nevada Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nevada Policy company nor Strata Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Strata Policy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nevada Policy company.

Nevada Policy company employs more people globally than Strata Policy company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Strata Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X