Comparison Overview

Nevada Policy

VS

Pew Research Center

Nevada Policy

7130 Placid Street, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89119
Last Update: 2025-12-04

The Nevada Policy Research Institute fights for your personal right to be free from the constraints and abuses of an ever-growing crony government, by conducting fact-based research and grassroots education that holds government accountable and transparent to the very people it is designed to serve. As a 501(c)(3) organization, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, the Institute does not lobby for or against legislation, nor does it endorse or oppose political candidates. Visit NPRI.org to learn more.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pew Research Center

1615 L St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nevada-policy.jpeg
Nevada Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-research-center.jpeg
Pew Research Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nevada Policy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pew Research Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nevada Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pew Research Center in 2025.

Incident History — Nevada Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nevada Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pew Research Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pew Research Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nevada-policy.jpeg
Nevada Policy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-research-center.jpeg
Pew Research Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pew Research Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nevada Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pew Research Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nevada Policy company.

In the current year, Pew Research Center company and Nevada Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Nevada Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Nevada Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Nevada Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nevada Policy company nor Pew Research Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nevada Policy company nor Pew Research Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pew Research Center company employs more people globally than Nevada Policy company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nevada Policy nor Pew Research Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X