Comparison Overview

Nevada Gold & Casinos

VS

The Casino Institute

Nevada Gold & Casinos

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Nevada Gold is actively seeking collaborations in owning, developing and managing gaming facilities, both domestically and internationally. Personal service is the hallmark of the Nevada Gold's style. The ultimate goal is to provide an extraordinary entertainment experience, while promoting growth and increased profitability for the facilities Nevada Gold owns and manages. Leadership focuses on re-aligning the company's assets, including divesting non-core assets and forming strategic partnerships for new gaming opportunities. Nevada Gold's team is committed to building long-term relationships with those they serve, always adding value to client endeavors. Our team members have experience in gaming markets across the globe. Nevada Gold (NYSE MKT: UWN) is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Casino Institute

8152 Miramar Road, San Deigo, California (CA), 92126, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Since 2004, The Casino Institute has specialized in Casino Consulting and Table Games Dealer Training Services. Formerly named, West Coast Dealing Academy...our name has changed but our service and quality still remains the same! We offer everything you need to know in order to become a professional casino dealer and we are the casino's first choice when hiring new dealers to their Table Games Department. ​ The Casino Institute also provides Casino Consulting Services and has recently held training contracts with Viejas Casino, Santa Ysabel Casino, The Lucky Derby Casino, Valley View Casino, Camel Rock Casino and Hollywood Casino Jamul to train their Dealers, Floor Supervisors and Surveillance Department Personnel. We work closely with over 11 tribal casinos and 4 local card rooms in Southern California.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nevada Gold & Casinos
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-casino-institute.jpeg
The Casino Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nevada Gold & Casinos
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Casino Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nevada Gold & Casinos in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Casino Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Nevada Gold & Casinos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nevada Gold & Casinos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Casino Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Casino Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nevada Gold & Casinos
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-casino-institute.jpeg
The Casino Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nevada Gold & Casinos company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Casino Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Casino Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nevada Gold & Casinos company.

In the current year, The Casino Institute company and Nevada Gold & Casinos company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Casino Institute company nor Nevada Gold & Casinos company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Casino Institute company nor Nevada Gold & Casinos company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Casino Institute company nor Nevada Gold & Casinos company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos company nor The Casino Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Casino Institute company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nevada Gold & Casinos company.

Nevada Gold & Casinos company employs more people globally than The Casino Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nevada Gold & Casinos nor The Casino Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H