Comparison Overview

Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

VS

D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services

Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

100 N Stewart St, Carson City, NV, 89701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Nevada is a land of magnificent and unique natural resources – from the shores of the Colorado River in the south, to the high deserts of Elko County in the north; from the waters of Lake Tahoe in the west, to the limestone geology of the east. Nevada’s natural diversity and abundance is second to none. Preserving, protecting and enhancing these wonders is the responsibility of the more than 900 employees of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Through their dedication and professionalism, Nevada continues to be one of the wealthiest states in the nation in terms of natural resources.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services

901 N. Glebe Road, Arlington, 22203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1991, DCLRS is a government relations and consulting firm with expertise in several key issues. Our staff has a reputation for being knowledgeable and results-oriented and we are experts in the legislative and regulatory processes. DCLRS staff is actively engaged with Capitol Hill, federal agencies, associations, and business group coalitions. We seek to build relationships for our clients with House and Senate offices through campaign work, fundraising and other networking opportunities. Our staff has worked on several presidential and congressional campaigns for Republicans and Democrats. We are also deeply connected to important congressional committees, influential members of Congress and their staffs, and senior decision makers in federal agencies. These connections, combined with our experience in the political process, give us the ability to help our clients solve legislative and regulatory problems. Each member of our team brings a strong background to this small, diverse, and highly effective government relations firm. The most important value a government relations firm can bring to a client is its honesty, integrity, empathy and sound judgment. We strive to be an integral part of your team. Our clients have trusted us over many years and allowed us to become effective, long-term partners with their organizations. We have grown slowly, but surely, always keeping these core values in mind. DCLRS has helped our clients succeed for over twenty years. We can help you succeed too.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nevada-department-of-conservation-and-natural-resources.jpeg
Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dclrs.jpeg
D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services in 2025.

Incident History — Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nevada-department-of-conservation-and-natural-resources.jpeg
Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dclrs.jpeg
D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company.

In the current year, D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company and Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company nor Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company nor Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company nor Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources company employs more people globally than D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources nor D.C. Legislative & Regulatory Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L