Comparison Overview

Neuromuscular WA

VS

AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited

Neuromuscular WA

11 Aberdare Road, Nedlands, Western Australia, AU, 6009
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://neuromuscularwa.org.au

Neuromuscular WA is a for-purpose organisation passionate about enhancing the quality of life, happiness and wellbeing of people living with neuromuscular conditions in WA. Since 1967, we’ve worked with hundreds of families, guiding them to get the best support and services they need and creating opportunites for them to connect with others in similar circumstances. We provide practical help that underpins their medical care and we support our members throughout their life, whenever they need it. We receive no ongoing government support and we rely on fundraising, donors and sponsors to continue to provide the financial backing for us to support our community. Visit our website to learn more about us and the people we help.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited

56 Edmondstone Road, Bowen Hills, QLD, AU, 4006
Last Update: 2025-11-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.agpal.com.au/

Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited (AGPAL) is a leading not-for-profit organisation, established in 1997 by industry members, as a provider for general practice accreditation and quality improvement services within Australia. AGPAL is part of the AGPAL Group of Companies. Here at AGPAL, we are dedicated to servicing and supporting general practices, Aboriginal medical services, medical deputising services, after hours services and Royal Flying Doctor Services throughout their accreditation and quality improvement journeys. Accreditation is our core business – let us share that with you.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agpalaccredited.jpeg
AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neuromuscular WA
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neuromuscular WA in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Neuromuscular WA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neuromuscular WA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neuromuscular-wa.jpeg
Neuromuscular WA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agpalaccredited.jpeg
AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Neuromuscular WA company and AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neuromuscular WA company.

In the current year, AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company and Neuromuscular WA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company nor Neuromuscular WA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company nor Neuromuscular WA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company nor Neuromuscular WA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neuromuscular WA company nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Neuromuscular WA company nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited company employs more people globally than Neuromuscular WA company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neuromuscular WA nor AGPAL - Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References