Comparison Overview

NeuroFlow

VS

Christian Children's Home of Ohio

NeuroFlow

1601 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neuroflow.com

NeuroFlow helps risk-bearing healthcare organizations improve outcomes and cost of care in complex populations by surfacing and supporting behavioral health needs that typically go undetected and under-addressed. Across payors, providers, and the federal government, NeuroFlow’s scalable technology and analytics capabilities empower organizations with actionable intelligence from real-time data collection and risk stratification, enabling them to manage populations in a financially sustainable way. Powered by deep expertise in whole-person care, NeuroFlow offers a path to risk predictability and proactive care that helps overcome the systemic challenges in today’s healthcare ecosystem.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Christian Children's Home of Ohio

2685 Armstrong Road, Wooster, Ohio, 44691, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccho.org

Christian Children's Home of Ohio, along with Encourage Foster Care and Encompass Christian Counseling, is a trauma-effective nonprofit organization serving youth and families since 1969. Our professional, compassionate team helps people across Ohio experience their worth in Christ through trusting relationships and supportive mental health treatment. Core Values: Relentless Commitment, Kindness and Selflessness One Heart One Family of Ministries Job Opportunities: ccho.org/jobs We are accredited by the Council on Accreditation for Children and Families, licensed by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, certified by the Ohio Department of Mental Health, and a member of the Ohio Association of Child Caring Agencies.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neuroflow.jpeg
NeuroFlow
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christian-children's-home-of-ohio.jpeg
Christian Children's Home of Ohio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NeuroFlow
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Christian Children's Home of Ohio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NeuroFlow in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Christian Children's Home of Ohio in 2026.

Incident History — NeuroFlow (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NeuroFlow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Christian Children's Home of Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Christian Children's Home of Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neuroflow.jpeg
NeuroFlow
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christian-children's-home-of-ohio.jpeg
Christian Children's Home of Ohio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Christian Children's Home of Ohio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NeuroFlow company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Christian Children's Home of Ohio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NeuroFlow company.

In the current year, Christian Children's Home of Ohio company and NeuroFlow company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Christian Children's Home of Ohio company nor NeuroFlow company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Christian Children's Home of Ohio company nor NeuroFlow company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Christian Children's Home of Ohio company nor NeuroFlow company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NeuroFlow company nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NeuroFlow company nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NeuroFlow company employs more people globally than Christian Children's Home of Ohio company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NeuroFlow nor Christian Children's Home of Ohio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References