Comparison Overview

neue leben Versicherungen

VS

RSA

neue leben Versicherungen

SachsenstraรŸe 8, None, Hamburg, Hamburg, DE, 20097
Last Update: 2025-08-19 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Die neue leben ist bundesweiter Vorsorge-Spezialist und kompetenter Partner fรผr Sparkassen in den Geschรคftsfeldern private und betriebliche Vorsorge. Sie arbeitet ohne eigenen AuรŸendienst und setzt konsequent auf den Vertrieb รผber Sparkassenpartner.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RSA

22 Bishopsgate, London, undefined, EC2N 4BQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

With a 300-year heritage, RSA is a multinational personal and commercial insurer operating across Europe. We have significant businesses in the UK and Ireland while RSA Luxembourg serves brokers and customers in Belgium, France, Spain and the Netherlands. RSA employs over 4,500 people and, in 2021, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Canadian insurer Intact Financial Corporation (TSX: IFC). Intact is the largest general insurer in Canada, and a leading provider of global specialty insurance.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,522
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neueleben.jpeg
neue leben Versicherungen
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rsa.jpeg
RSA
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
neue leben Versicherungen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for neue leben Versicherungen in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RSA in 2025.

Incident History โ€” neue leben Versicherungen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

neue leben Versicherungen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” RSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neueleben.jpeg
neue leben Versicherungen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rsa.jpeg
RSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both neue leben Versicherungen company and RSA company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, RSA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to neue leben Versicherungen company.

In the current year, RSA company and neue leben Versicherungen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RSA company nor neue leben Versicherungen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RSA company nor neue leben Versicherungen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RSA company nor neue leben Versicherungen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither neue leben Versicherungen company nor RSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

RSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to neue leben Versicherungen company.

RSA company employs more people globally than neue leben Versicherungen company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.