Comparison Overview

Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY

VS

JTR Collections Management

Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY

735 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577-1402, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Neuberger Museum of Art, located at the heart of Purchase College, SUNY, is a vital cultural resource of modern, contemporary, and African art for Westchester County, NY and beyond. From the mid-century American art and African art that form the core of the collection to the presentation of contemporary art, we continue the commitment of founding patron Roy R. Neuberger (1903-2010) by championing the art of our time.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JTR Collections Management

Oakland, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

JTR Collections Management offers a wide range of Collections Management, Registration, and Educational services for private collectors, artist foundations, auction houses, historic houses, and museums of all sizes. Collections Management and Registration services: Collections policy and procedure research and writing Collections and artist research Loan processing and coordination Shipping, packing, and rehousing recommendations Condition reporting Deaccession coordination Collections surveys and inventories Storage recommendations and planning Collections moves Insurance and risk management review and recommendations General Facilities Report research and review Art and artifact safety and security recommendations Installation recommendations Collection review for estate reconciliation Collection records organization, recommendations, and review NAGPRA assistance Historic House upkeep and maintenance recommendations Earthquake mitigation and pest management recommendations AAM Accreditation application research Research and recommendations to expand museum collections access projects and programs to enhance the visitor experience Educational services: Guest Lecturer – Collections Management/Registration techniques Collections handling training Volunteer and docent trainings

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neubergermuseum.jpeg
Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jtr-collections-management.jpeg
JTR Collections Management
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JTR Collections Management
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JTR Collections Management in 2026.

Incident History — Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JTR Collections Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JTR Collections Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neubergermuseum.jpeg
Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jtr-collections-management.jpeg
JTR Collections Management
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JTR Collections Management company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JTR Collections Management company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company.

In the current year, JTR Collections Management company and Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JTR Collections Management company nor Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JTR Collections Management company nor Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JTR Collections Management company nor Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company nor JTR Collections Management company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company nor JTR Collections Management company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY company employs more people globally than JTR Collections Management company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neuberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, SUNY nor JTR Collections Management holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N