Comparison Overview

Network of Ensemble Theaters

VS

Acrobatic Conundrum

Network of Ensemble Theaters

PO Box 83526, Portland, OR, 97283, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ensembletheaters.net

A national coalition of ensembles created by and for artists, the Network of Ensemble Theaters (NET) exists to propel ensemble theater practice to the forefront of culture and society. NET links a diverse array of ensembles and practitioners to one another and the performing arts field, encouraging collaborations and knowledge building and dissemination. NET is committed to the advancement of the ensemble form and strives to bring about change in the world beyond ourselves through the transformative power of collaborative theater. We support bold artistic and civic experiments and aim to heighten the impact and excellence of ensemble theater.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Acrobatic Conundrum

2425 South Spokane St, Seattle, WA, US, 98144
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.acrobaticconundrum.com

Acrobatic Conundrum, Seattle's premier contemporary circus arts company, creates ensemble-based performances that engage and amaze audiences. Founded in 2012 by Artistic Director Terry Crane, the company blends virtuosic circus skill, dance and physical theater to create work that is poetic, a little absurd, beautiful and deeply relatable. Acrobatic Conundrum has produced five shows and appeared nationally and internationally at such venues as New York City’s SummerStage, the Chicago Contemporary Circus Festival, the Smithsonian Museum’s Renwick Gallery, the Vancouver CircusFest, TEDxRainier, and The Backstreet Festival in Alexandria, Egypt. The company is a 2015 recipient of the City of Seattle’s CityArtist Projects Award.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-of-ensemble-theaters.jpeg
Network of Ensemble Theaters
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acrobatic-conundrum.jpeg
Acrobatic Conundrum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Network of Ensemble Theaters
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Acrobatic Conundrum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network of Ensemble Theaters in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acrobatic Conundrum in 2025.

Incident History — Network of Ensemble Theaters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network of Ensemble Theaters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Acrobatic Conundrum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acrobatic Conundrum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-of-ensemble-theaters.jpeg
Network of Ensemble Theaters
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acrobatic-conundrum.jpeg
Acrobatic Conundrum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Acrobatic Conundrum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Network of Ensemble Theaters company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Acrobatic Conundrum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Network of Ensemble Theaters company.

In the current year, Acrobatic Conundrum company and Network of Ensemble Theaters company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Acrobatic Conundrum company nor Network of Ensemble Theaters company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Acrobatic Conundrum company nor Network of Ensemble Theaters company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Acrobatic Conundrum company nor Network of Ensemble Theaters company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters company nor Acrobatic Conundrum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters company nor Acrobatic Conundrum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Network of Ensemble Theaters company employs more people globally than Acrobatic Conundrum company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Network of Ensemble Theaters nor Acrobatic Conundrum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References