Comparison Overview

Network Makers

VS

Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA)

Network Makers

30 Wall Street, New York, New York, 10005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Network Makers is a full service IT consulting company. We partner with expanding businesses to design, improve, and maintain their information-technology infrastructure. We help rapidly growing companies convert their modest networks into state-of-the-art, custom-tailored IT systems. Whether your company has ten employees or several hundred, we have the know-how to engineer a solution that is scalable to grow with your business. We are not your typical “short-term IT consultants” looking for a quick and easy answer. We can provide a complete turnkey solution or specific, one-time improvements—for example, upgrading a phone system or moving your email to the cloud. We have the ability to architect and engineer anything the client can envision. Yes, anything.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA)

5353 Wayzata Blvd, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Fibre Channel Industry Association's (FCIA) sole purpose is to act as the independent technology and marketing voice of the Fibre Channel industry. FCIA members include manufacturers, system integrators, developers, vendors, industry professionals, and end users. Our member-led working groups and committees focus on creating and championing the Fibre Channel technology roadmaps, targeting applications that include data storage, video, networking, and storage area network (SAN) management.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-makers.jpeg
Network Makers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fibre-channel-industry-association.jpeg
Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Network Makers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network Makers in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) in 2025.

Incident History — Network Makers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network Makers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-makers.jpeg
Network Makers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fibre-channel-industry-association.jpeg
Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Network Makers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Network Makers company.

In the current year, Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company and Network Makers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company nor Network Makers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company nor Network Makers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company nor Network Makers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Network Makers company nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Network Makers company nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Network Makers company employs more people globally than Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Network Makers nor Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.