Comparison Overview

Netrix IT

VS

Computacenter

Netrix IT

2520 Pilot Knob Rd, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, 55120, US
Last Update: 2025-03-17 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

About Netrix IT In 2023 Netrix IT joined ITPartners+, a leading IT Managed Services Provider with headquarters in Grand Rapids, MI. The combined companies focus on delivering security first managed services to those who value responsiveness and partnership. With a local presence serving the greater Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area, ITPartners+ partners with businesses, non-profits, and IT professionals to solve complex problems and develop solutions that drive their business.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Computacenter

Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9TW, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Transform and Manage their technology infrastructure to deliver digital transformation, enabling people and their business. Computacenter plc is a public company quoted on the London Stock Exchange (CCC.L) and a member of the FTSE 250. Computacenter employs over 20,000 people worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,480
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netrix-it.jpeg
Netrix IT
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computacenter.jpeg
Computacenter
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Netrix IT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Computacenter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Netrix IT in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Netrix IT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Netrix IT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netrix-it.jpeg
Netrix IT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computacenter.jpeg
Computacenter
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Mailbox Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Netrix IT company and Computacenter company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Computacenter company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Netrix IT company has not reported any.

In the current year, Computacenter company and Netrix IT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Computacenter company nor Netrix IT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Computacenter company nor Netrix IT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Computacenter company nor Netrix IT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Netrix IT company nor Computacenter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Netrix IT company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Computacenter company.

Computacenter company employs more people globally than Netrix IT company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X