Comparison Overview

Netcare

VS

Lehigh Valley Health Network

Netcare

76 Maude street (corner West street), Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2196, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Netcare Group (JSE: NTC) offers a unique, comprehensive range of medical services across the healthcare spectrum, enabling us to serve the health and care needs of each individual who entrust their care to us. Our focus on implementing sophisticated digital systems will enable us to provide care that is fully integrated and an enhanced experience across our Group's operations. At Netcare, we are striving to change healthcare for the better. In addition to its world-class acute private hospital services, Netcare provides: o radiosurgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant and robotic-assisted surgery through Netcare Cancer Care; o primary healthcare services through Medicross; o emergency medical services through Netcare 911; o occupational health and employee wellness services through Netcare Occupational Health; o mental health and psychiatric services through Akeso; o innovative solutions to increase access to quality and affordable private healthcare through NetcarePlus; and o renal dialysis services through National Renal Care (NRC). Netcare is also a leading private trainer of emergency medical and nursing personnel in the country. For more information visit www.netcare.co.za.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,782
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lehigh Valley Health Network

1200 S Cedar Crest Blvd, Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN) is proudly part of Jefferson Health, forming a leading integrated academic health care delivery system. With 65,000 colleagues, 32 hospitals and over 700 sites of care across the Lehigh Valley, northeastern Pennsylvania, Delaware Valley and southern New Jersey. LVHN’s mission is to heal, comfort and care for our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care, supported by education and clinical research. LVHN's rich history, spanning over 125 years, is rooted in a commitment to exceptional care and innovation. Our values—compassion, integrity, collaboration and excellence—guide us in delivering superior health care every day. LVHN’s Social Engagement Policy: The mission of LVHN’s social channels is to inspire, engage and inform our community about our services and to help you live a healthier life. We encourage healthy and productive conversation and welcome a diversity of opinions. However, we do not tolerate harassment, disparaging comments, profanity, libelous statements, malicious misinformation, political campaigning, spamming, solicitation, racism, hate speech or any other inappropriate behavior. We reserve the right to remove comments and ban users who participate in unproductive or harmful activities. Our goal is to maintain a respectful and supportive environment for everyone.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,542
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netcare.jpeg
Netcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-valley-hospital.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Netcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lehigh Valley Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Netcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lehigh Valley Health Network in 2025.

Incident History — Netcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Netcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lehigh Valley Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lehigh Valley Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netcare.jpeg
Netcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-valley-hospital.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Netcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lehigh Valley Health Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lehigh Valley Health Network company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Netcare company.

In the current year, Lehigh Valley Health Network company and Netcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Netcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Netcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Netcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Netcare company nor Lehigh Valley Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lehigh Valley Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Netcare company.

Netcare company employs more people globally than Lehigh Valley Health Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Netcare nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H