Comparison Overview

Imprint.com

VS

Kopykat Design & Print

Imprint.com

14550 Beechnut Street, Houston, TX 77075, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

With hundreds of promotional product companies in the market, it's difficult to choose one to trust. Since 2006, our focus has been providing our best price, quality, and service in the industry. Thanks to our amazing customers and our dedication to providing high quality products, we have developed into one of America's fastest growing promotional products manufacturers. Our passion has led us to improve traditional manufacturing methods by using the latest technology and equipment. This journey has helped us modernize our techniques and reach a global community. In addition to our exceptionally talented staff, we have dedicated over 150,000 Sqft of space towards making the highest quality promotional items. We take pride in processing all of our products in house. Knowing our products leave a lasting impression, each team member works diligently to make sure each order is made to provide the utmost satisfaction for our customers. Thanks to our relationship with other top manufacturers like Bic™, we look forward to expanding our product line further. With over 1 billion promotional products sold across the globe, our experience is unmatched. The sum of our effort can be seen in our low prices, quality products, and fast turnaround.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 206
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kopykat Design & Print

London, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We are a central London print group based near Liverpool Street and Old Street underground stations and Shoreditch overground. We have over 30 years experience providing clients with a full-service approach to all their printing needs. Kopykat has both digital and offset print technologies as well as large format so we will always recommend the the best option for yoru printed items. Items we print include newsletters, brochures, posters, business cards, leaflets, postcards, menus. Our large format division prints roll up banners and exhibition posters that can also be mounted in-house. Although London based we distribute around the UK for clients with multi-office locations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netbrands-media-corp-imprint.com.jpeg
Imprint.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kopykat Design & Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Imprint.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kopykat Design & Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imprint.com in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kopykat Design & Print in 2025.

Incident History — Imprint.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imprint.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kopykat Design & Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kopykat Design & Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netbrands-media-corp-imprint.com.jpeg
Imprint.com
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kopykat Design & Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kopykat Design & Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Imprint.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kopykat Design & Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Imprint.com company.

In the current year, Kopykat Design & Print company and Imprint.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kopykat Design & Print company nor Imprint.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kopykat Design & Print company nor Imprint.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kopykat Design & Print company nor Imprint.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Imprint.com company nor Kopykat Design & Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Imprint.com company nor Kopykat Design & Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Imprint.com company employs more people globally than Kopykat Design & Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Imprint.com nor Kopykat Design & Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N