Comparison Overview

NetApp

VS

Workday

NetApp

3060 Olsen Dr, San Jose, California, US, 95128
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Build an intelligent data infrastructure with NetApp that brings it all together — a smarter way to let data thrive. Any application, any data, anywhere.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,357
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Workday

6110 Stoneridge Mall Rd, None, Pleasanton, California, US, 94588
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Workday is a leading provider of enterprise cloud applications for finance and human resources, helping customers adapt and thrive in a changing world. Workday applications for financial management, human resources, planning, spend management, and analytics are built with artificial intelligence and machine learning at the core to help organizations around the world embrace the future of work. Workday is used by more than 10,000 organizations around the world and across industries – from medium-sized businesses to more than 50% of the Fortune 500.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 25,257
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netapp.jpeg
NetApp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workday.jpeg
Workday
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NetApp
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Workday
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

NetApp has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Workday has 250.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — NetApp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetApp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Workday (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workday cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netapp.jpeg
NetApp
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authenticated Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workday.jpeg
Workday
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Third-Party Application (Drift), OAuth Credential Abuse, Targeted Search Queries in Salesforce
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing (SMS/Phone Calls), Impersonation (HR/IT Personnel), Credential Harvesting
Motivation: Data Theft for Further Social Engineering, Credential Harvesting
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NetApp company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Workday company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Workday company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to NetApp company.

In the current year, Workday company has reported more cyber incidents than NetApp company.

Neither Workday company nor NetApp company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Workday company has disclosed at least one data breach, while NetApp company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Workday company nor NetApp company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

NetApp company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Workday company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Workday company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NetApp company.

Workday company employs more people globally than NetApp company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NetApp nor Workday holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N