Comparison Overview

Nestor Psychogeriatric Association

VS

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital

Nestor Psychogeriatric Association

I. Drosopoulou 22, Athens, GR
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Nestor is a Not for Profit organization offering specialized, high quality and free of charge services for patients with dementia and their caregivers. Nestor developed three Memory Clinics in order to promote early diagnosis and proper treatment for patients with dementia. More than 2500 people take advantage of our two memory clinics yearly. Our services include: a) A 10 bed short-Term Hospitalization Clinic for dementia patients. The main goal of the Clinic is to give the caregivers a rest from their very difficult work of providing care to dementia patients. The mean hospitalization time is 15 days. b) Two Day Care Centers for dementia patients in Athens in the region of Attica and one more Day Care Center in Kozani a city; located in West Macedonia region. Different occupational therapy programs are applied according to the patients’ cognitive and functional level. c) 24/7 Helpline for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. d) Caregivers’ training program and Alzheimer Cafè. e) Psycho-educational intervention for highly burdened dementia patient caregivers. f) Educational program for health professionals in Psychogeriatrics.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital

3021 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy, Henderson, 89052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital, a comprehensive provider of mental health and addiction services located in Henderson, Nevada, offers superior care to men, women, and young people in a state-of-the-art center that houses 134 beds. With an overarching mission to supply exceptional care that can lead each patient towards a truly healed life, Seven Hills has and will continue to be an invaluable source of hope for those battling mental illness and chemical dependency. Among the mental health concerns and addictions that can be treated at this pioneering hospital, the following are those that are the most common: • Alcohol addition • Alzheimer’s disease • Anxiety • Bipolar disorder • Cocaine addiction • Dementia • Depression • Heroin addiction • Meth addiction • Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) • Prescription drug addiction • Schizophrenia • Self-harm • Suicidal ideation Via medically-monitored detoxification services, specialized inpatient care, high-quality partial hospitalization programming, intensive outpatient services, top notch addiction treatment, and concern-specific care for various age groups, Seven Hills Hospital is where hope and promise for a healthier tomorrow can be fully realized. Here, each patient is supported every step of the way towards a better life. To speak to a knowledgeable staff member about Seven Hills Hospital’s services call (702) 919-6182, or to get more information about the various programs available, feel free to visit www.sevenhillsbi.com at your earliest convenience.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 174
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nestor-psychogeriatric-association.jpeg
Nestor Psychogeriatric Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seven-hills-hospital.jpeg
Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nestor Psychogeriatric Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestor Psychogeriatric Association in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Nestor Psychogeriatric Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestor Psychogeriatric Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nestor-psychogeriatric-association.jpeg
Nestor Psychogeriatric Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seven-hills-hospital.jpeg
Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company has not reported any.

In the current year, Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company and Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company nor Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company nor Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company.

Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital company employs more people globally than Nestor Psychogeriatric Association company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nestor Psychogeriatric Association nor Seven Hills Behavioral Health Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N