Comparison Overview

Neptunia S.A

VS

BFS Services

Neptunia S.A

Av. Argentina 2085 - Callao, Callao, 01, PE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Neptunia S.A. es el Terminal de Almacenamiento Marítimo líder en el sector del Comercio Exterior Marítimo peruano, desde 1980. Manteniendo desde nuestros inicios la convicción de facilitar las operaciones involucradas en el proceso del comercio exterior, para lo cual realizamos constantes esfuerzos e inversiones en la capacitación del personal, una permanente innovación tecnológica y una constante ampliación y mejora a la infraestructura.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BFS Services

500 Airline dr., Coppell, TX, 75019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

BFS Services has over 400,000 sq ft state of the art warehouse and distribution facility, an asset based fleet, so there no distribution puzzle that we can’t help you solve. Our main warehouse is located in Coppell, TX just 10 minutes from DFW International Airport. There are additional satellite warehouses in Carrollton and Flower Mound Texas. For over 40 years, BFS Services has established itself as a premier local 3PL delivery service, warehousing, distribution, and fulfillment provider. BFS employs a seasoned staff of logistics professionals who are ready to help you solve any issue in your supply chain or distribution network. We welcome you to take advantage of the relationships with partners we have developed over the years. Reach out to us for a quote on your next LTL shipment or compare your next Full Truck Load rate, please give us a call and see what we can do!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neptunia-sa.jpeg
Neptunia S.A
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bfsservices.jpeg
BFS Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neptunia S.A
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BFS Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neptunia S.A in 2025.

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BFS Services in 2025.

Incident History — Neptunia S.A (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neptunia S.A cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BFS Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BFS Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neptunia-sa.jpeg
Neptunia S.A
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bfsservices.jpeg
BFS Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BFS Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Neptunia S.A company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BFS Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neptunia S.A company.

In the current year, BFS Services company and Neptunia S.A company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BFS Services company nor Neptunia S.A company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BFS Services company nor Neptunia S.A company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BFS Services company nor Neptunia S.A company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neptunia S.A company nor BFS Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Neptunia S.A company nor BFS Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neptunia S.A company employs more people globally than BFS Services company, reflecting its scale as a Warehousing.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neptunia S.A nor BFS Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N