Comparison Overview

NeoLaw

VS

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.

NeoLaw

30-34 Curtain Road, London, EC2A 3NZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

NeoLaw is a full-service, commercially focused legal practice delivering professional, effective legal services for corporate and blue chip enterprises, SMEs and community organisations. Our team of expert lawyers add measurable value, delivering innovative solutions to your commercial legal issues - from the complex to the esoteric. Our legal professionals’ technical knowledge and proven expertise ensures we deliver successful outcomes for our enterprise clients. We are approachable and listen well, delivering where others do not by ensuring we fully understand your objectives and retain a clear focus on delivering results against that agenda. We are aware that in today’s challenging economic climate cost of service is always an issue. We offer tailored and flexible approaches to our engagement, always finding a positive and practical payment model. The results speak for themselves - our success rate over the years has resulted in NeoLaw developing long lasting and trusted working relationships with business clients of all sizes. With our teams’ in excess of 25 years’ experience in delivering legal services for business, we are confident that we can provide the legal support that your enterprise needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.

9100 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills, 90212, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Segal, Cohen & Landis, PC, a law firm of tax attorneys, collectively has over forty years of tax litigation experience and have successfully resolved over 8,500 IRS disputes. IRS tax attorneys in our firm possess Master of Law degrees (LL.M) in Taxation with specialties in IRS dispute and controversy resolution. Our IRS Tax Attorneys resolve IRS Wage Garnishments, Levies, IRS Liens or Back Taxes. We negotiate Offer in Compromise or Installment Agreements with the IRS. Segal, Cohen & Landis has a stellar reputation in the legal community, and an exemplary record of customer satisfaction.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neolaw.jpeg
NeoLaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scltaxlaw.jpeg
Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NeoLaw
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NeoLaw in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — NeoLaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NeoLaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neolaw.jpeg
NeoLaw
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scltaxlaw.jpeg
Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NeoLaw company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NeoLaw company.

In the current year, Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company and NeoLaw company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company nor NeoLaw company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company nor NeoLaw company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company nor NeoLaw company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NeoLaw company nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NeoLaw company nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company employs more people globally than NeoLaw company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NeoLaw nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X