Comparison Overview

Neobpo

VS

HGS

Neobpo

Rua Pais Leme, 14, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05424-010
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Somos especializados em integrar tecnologia com inteligência humana, oferecendo soluções digitais que promovem transformação e eficiência operacional. Nosso foco é gerar valor por meio de resultados reais, utilizando inteligência digital para atender às necessidades específicas de cada cliente. Mergulhamos nos desafios de empresas que buscam inovação, modernização e escalabilidade, oferecendo soluções seguras e personalizadas para impulsionar seu crescimento. Adotamos uma abordagem consultiva ao longo de toda a jornada, identificando oportunidades estratégicas desde o primeiro contato, proporcionando soluções sob medida que combinam dados, automação e atendimento dedicado. O impacto que geramos vai além da entrega de resultados. Transformamos a forma como nossos clientes operam, melhorando sua produtividade, segurança e escalabilidade, garantindo um crescimento sustentável e criando valor mensurável para seus negócios.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,222
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HGS

HGS USA Corporate Headquarters , Chicago, IL , undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

A global leader in optimizing the customer experience lifecycle, digital transformation, and business process management, HGS is helping its clients become more competitive every day. HGS combines automation, analytics, and artificial intelligence with deep domain expertise focusing on digital customer experiences, back-office processing, contact centers, and HRO solutions. Part of the multi-billion-dollar conglomerate Hinduja Group, HGS takes a “globally local” approach with over 21,600 employees across 38 delivery centers in 6 countries.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 27,834
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neohypeco.jpeg
Neobpo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hinduja-global-solutions-inc--.jpeg
HGS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neobpo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HGS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neobpo in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HGS in 2025.

Incident History — Neobpo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neobpo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HGS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HGS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neohypeco.jpeg
Neobpo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hinduja-global-solutions-inc--.jpeg
HGS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neobpo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HGS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HGS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neobpo company.

In the current year, HGS company and Neobpo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HGS company nor Neobpo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HGS company nor Neobpo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HGS company nor Neobpo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neobpo company nor HGS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HGS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Neobpo company.

HGS company employs more people globally than Neobpo company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neobpo nor HGS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H