Comparison Overview

Nelson Mullins Encompass

VS

Robins Kaplan LLP

Nelson Mullins Encompass

1320 Main Street, Columbia, SC, 29201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Encompass, a division of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, provides information governance, electronic discovery, and document review services. We serve as enterprise e-discovery counsel and global discovery and review counsel to clients in heavily regulated industries. Headquartered in Columbia, SC with dedicated review facilities in Columbia, SC and Nashville, TN, the Encompass team combines in-depth knowledge of discovery for litigation, proven project management practices, and a right-sized approach to technology to suit client needs and deliver results. Clients receive law firm advice and accountability from a team keenly focused on client service and value. For more information, please contact us at [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Robins Kaplan LLP

800 Lasalle Avenue, Suite 2800, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, 55402
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Robins Kaplan LLP is among the nation’s premier trial law firms, with more than 200 attorneys in Bismarck, N.D.; Boston; Los Angeles; Minneapolis; New York; Silicon Valley; and Sioux Falls, S.D. Our attorneys litigate, mediate, and arbitrate client disputes, always at-the-ready for an ultimate courtroom battle. When huge forces are at play, major money is at stake, or rights are being trampled, we help clients cut through complexity, get to the heart of the problem, and win what matters most. We are clearly focused on business results for our clients. We achieve landmark triumphs and drive thousands of other cases to resolution before they ever hit the courtroom or the front page. From Big Tobacco to Kraft v. Starbucks, Bhopal and the World Trade Center—we have changed law, business, and society for the better by redefining what’s possible.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 528
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelson-mullins-encompass.jpeg
Nelson Mullins Encompass
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinskaplanllp.jpeg
Robins Kaplan LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nelson Mullins Encompass
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Robins Kaplan LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nelson Mullins Encompass in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robins Kaplan LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Nelson Mullins Encompass (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nelson Mullins Encompass cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Robins Kaplan LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robins Kaplan LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelson-mullins-encompass.jpeg
Nelson Mullins Encompass
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinskaplanllp.jpeg
Robins Kaplan LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Robins Kaplan LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nelson Mullins Encompass company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Robins Kaplan LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nelson Mullins Encompass company.

In the current year, Robins Kaplan LLP company and Nelson Mullins Encompass company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Robins Kaplan LLP company nor Nelson Mullins Encompass company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Robins Kaplan LLP company nor Nelson Mullins Encompass company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Robins Kaplan LLP company nor Nelson Mullins Encompass company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass company nor Robins Kaplan LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass company nor Robins Kaplan LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Robins Kaplan LLP company employs more people globally than Nelson Mullins Encompass company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nelson Mullins Encompass nor Robins Kaplan LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X