Comparison Overview

Nelson Associates

VS

Lin Smith Design

Nelson Associates

29 Farm Street, Mayfair, London, W1J 5RL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Nelson Associates is a luxury brand design consultancy based in Mayfair, London specialising in brand identity, design and development, art direction, packaging, printed literature, advertising and interactive design. Renowned for it’s innovative and highly thoughtful approach to design, the studio has amassed a diverse and impressive client list and produced a wide range of acclaimed work.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lin Smith Design

4513 Meadow Run Place, Jacksonville, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Lin Smith Design delivers award-winning design solutions and diversified marketing materials to a wide range of local, national and international clients. Whether for posters or packaging, corporate identity, company brochures, annual reports, catalogs, display and trade show graphics, illustration or direct mail, Lin Smith works closely with clients, tailoring projects to fit their needs and budgets. Designer, Lin Smith, offers creative solutions to print and advertising projects with a commitment to quality, a strong sense of design, and the ability to interpret clients' needs. She has extensive experience in collateral and advertising print design, and long association with the printing industry. Lin has worked in-house with both ad agencies and printers, and has worked as de-facto art department for many companies, both small and large. Born and raised in Peru, Lin has also lived in West Africa and the Caribbean, bringing a global perspective to the work.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelson-associates_2.jpeg
Nelson Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lin-smith-design.jpeg
Lin Smith Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nelson Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lin Smith Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nelson Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lin Smith Design in 2025.

Incident History — Nelson Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nelson Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lin Smith Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lin Smith Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelson-associates_2.jpeg
Nelson Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lin-smith-design.jpeg
Lin Smith Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lin Smith Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nelson Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lin Smith Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nelson Associates company.

In the current year, Lin Smith Design company and Nelson Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lin Smith Design company nor Nelson Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lin Smith Design company nor Nelson Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lin Smith Design company nor Nelson Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nelson Associates company nor Lin Smith Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nelson Associates company nor Lin Smith Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nelson Associates nor Lin Smith Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X