Comparison Overview

NEJM Group

VS

Cinefex

NEJM Group

860 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451-1413, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://NEJMgroup.org

NEJM Group brings together the people and products that have made the New England Journal of Medicine, NEJM AI, NEJM Evidence, NEJM Catalyst, NEJM Journal Watch, and NEJM CareerCenter leaders in providing the medical knowledge health care professionals need to deliver the best patient care. The goal of NEJM Group is to meet the rapidly growing demand for essential medical information and to disseminate that content in new ways to a broader global health care community than ever before. Our publications reach health care professionals around the globe — making connections between clinical science and clinical practice that advance medical knowledge, health care delivery, and patient outcomes. NEJM Group is a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 257
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Cinefex

1160 N Coast Hwy 101 #232386, Encinitas, California, 92023-2386, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cinefex.com/

Cinefex is a bimonthly magazine devoted to motion picture visual effects. Since 1980, it has been the bible for effects professionals and enthusiasts, covering the field like no other publication. Profusely illustrated in color, with in-depth articles and interviews, Cinefex offers a captivating look at the technologies and techniques behind many of our most popular and enduring movies.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nejm-group.jpeg
NEJM Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinefex-magazine.jpeg
Cinefex
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NEJM Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cinefex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEJM Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinefex in 2025.

Incident History — NEJM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEJM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cinefex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinefex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nejm-group.jpeg
NEJM Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Code Installation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinefex-magazine.jpeg
Cinefex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEJM Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cinefex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NEJM Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cinefex company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cinefex company and NEJM Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cinefex company nor NEJM Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NEJM Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cinefex company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cinefex company nor NEJM Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NEJM Group company nor Cinefex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NEJM Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cinefex company.

NEJM Group company employs more people globally than Cinefex company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NEJM Group nor Cinefex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References