Comparison Overview

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

VS

Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

176 Water Company Road, P.O. Box 33, Millersburg, PA, US, 17061
Last Update: 2026-04-04

"Seeing is more than merely looking, it involves noticing things" - Ned Smith The mission of the Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art is to honor the legacy of Ned Smith by merging the arts and natural world through education, exhibition, and experiences. Rooted in the scenic Susquehanna Valley of Central Pennsylvania, we strive to be the leading institution for the collection and dissemination of art and natural history knowledge, particularly when the two intersect and reinforce one another. We are the repository for the art, writings and other work of the late Ned Smith, from whose life the center takes its original inspiration. The center seeks to appeal to all ages, races and genders across Pennsylvania and beyond. Our goal is to be viewed as a vibrant cornerstone to the cultural, economic, social and environmental life of communities near and far.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art

1043 Virginia Ave, Indianapolis, 46203, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2001 by a group of arts benefactors and enthusiasts, the Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art (iMOCA) began as – and still remains – Indianapolis’ only museum dedicated solely to showing and advancing contemporary art. As a non-collecting institution, iMOCA’s mission is to bring contemporary exhibitions and programs to the Indianapolis community to stimulate minds, inspire new discoveries and demonstrate the vital connections between visual culture and life. Prior to having a dedicated space, iMOCA operated as a “museum without walls,” mounting exhibitions throughout Indianapolis at venues including the Stutz, Herron School of Art and Design, and Key Cinemas. In 2004, iMOCA found a home in the historic Emelie Building in the Indiana Avenue Cultural District, thanks to the generosity of local law firm Katz and Korin, PC. In 2009, iMOCA moved into the Murphy Building in the heart of Fountain Square. The move placed the museum in an actively revitalizing area and iMOCA became inseparable from the thriving Fountain Square art scene. In October 2014, iMOCA entered into a partnership with Buckingham Companies and Buckingham Foundation to program a gallery space in The Alexander Hotel at CityWay. iMOCA strives to present artwork that increases the understanding and appreciation of contemporary visual culture, provoking dialogue and encouraging the discovery that art is all around us. The museum supports a wide variety of emerging and mid-career artists through innovative exhibitions and audience engagement. Artist talks, workshops and other programming offer unique points of entry into the world of contemporary art. By offering free admission, iMOCA prides itself on accessibility.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nedsmithcenter.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-museum-of-contemporary-art.jpeg
Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art in 2026.

Incident History — Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nedsmithcenter.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-museum-of-contemporary-art.jpeg
Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company and Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company.

In the current year, Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company and Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company employs more people globally than Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.