Comparison Overview

Nederlands Openluchtmuseum

VS

Bath Preservation Trust

Nederlands Openluchtmuseum

Hoeferlaan 4, Arnhem, 6816 SG, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Het Nederlands Openluchtmuseum vangt de geschiedenis. In authentieke gebouwen, voorwerpen en ware verhalen. We nemen u mee op een reis door de tijd. Van twee eeuwen geleden tot heel recent. Er is volop leven in het museum. Op de boerenerven, in de boerderijen, huizen en de molens, het boerencafé en de winkeltjes. Het museum ligt in een prachtig park aan de rand van de gezellige stad Arnhem. U komt er ogen te kort. De mensen van het museum lijken zo uit het verleden te zijn weggelopen. Trots op hun erfgoed, inspireren ze u met hun verhalen. Gaan uw kinderen ‘aan het werk’ op het kindererf of toch liever spelen op het mooie Zaanse plein? Worden het poffertjes met poedersuiker, stevige huisgemaakte soep, of toch die verse krentenbol van de bakker? En hoe reizen we vandaag? Pak de historische tram of wandel door de tijd. Voor jong en ouder is een bezoek aan het museumpark indrukwekkend en onvergetelijk. Zintuigen worden geprikkeld. Geluiden, geuren, smaken en beelden nemen u mee naar vroeger. Levende historie raakt, welke leeftijd je ook hebt. Beleef momenten van herkenning en verbazing. Stap letterlijk terug in de sfeer van toen en maak kennis met de Nederlanders en hun geschiedenis. Het Openluchtmuseum te Arnhem is ook een bijzondere locatie voor bijeenkomsten. U kunt in het museum trouwen, vergaderen en een feest geven. Maar ook genieten van een lunch of diner. Zelfs een evenement voor meer dan 5.000 mensen behoort tot de mogelijkheden.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 334
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bath Preservation Trust

Bath, BA1 5NA, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-20

About Us. Bath Preservation Trust was founded in 1934 as a small pressure group, with the object of protecting the city's unique architectural heritage. Bath is many things to many people but we want it to be a place for everyone which can positively adapt to Climate Change and continue to evolve through sustainable and holistic design-led development, to complement and add value to its global reputation as a living heritage city. Encircled by beautiful countryside, bisected by the River Avon and with an abundance of trees, open spaces and parklands, Bath also has striking architecture, a vibrant economy and engaged communities. It has immense potential to be a net zero carbon, liveable, green city. We believe Bath deserves excellence in design and contemporary sustainable development which is inclusive of all people, and improves social and economic opportunities without compromising our unparalleled built heritage and natural environment. BPT works independently and in partnership with a broad range of other statutory and non-statutory partners to: Deliver our commitment to sustainable development for Bath and demonstrate the value of heritage in a changing world Advocate and campaign for the total public realm, a healthy environment and a thriving living city Champion forward-thinking and appropriate sustainable architecture and design worthy of the World Heritage City of Bath Provide opportunities for learning for people of all ages in all areas of our work, supporting personal wellbeing and social inclusion Fundamentally, we are an organisation which seeks positive and constructive solutions to the present and future threats faced by Bath, its rural environs and the people, communities and businesses it supports. BPT is also a major enabler of the tourist economy, providing museums and educational activities at No. 1 Royal Crescent, the Museum of Bath Architecture, Beckford’s Tower and Landscape and the Herschel Museum of Astronomy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nederlands-openluchtmuseum.jpeg
Nederlands Openluchtmuseum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bath-preservation-trust.jpeg
Bath Preservation Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nederlands Openluchtmuseum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bath Preservation Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nederlands Openluchtmuseum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bath Preservation Trust in 2026.

Incident History — Nederlands Openluchtmuseum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nederlands Openluchtmuseum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bath Preservation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bath Preservation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nederlands-openluchtmuseum.jpeg
Nederlands Openluchtmuseum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bath-preservation-trust.jpeg
Bath Preservation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bath Preservation Trust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bath Preservation Trust company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company.

In the current year, Bath Preservation Trust company and Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust company nor Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust company nor Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bath Preservation Trust company nor Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company nor Bath Preservation Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bath Preservation Trust company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company.

Nederlands Openluchtmuseum company employs more people globally than Bath Preservation Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nederlands Openluchtmuseum nor Bath Preservation Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H