Comparison Overview

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

VS

South Bend Museum of Art

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

176 Water Company Road, Millersburg, PA, 17061, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

"Seeing is more than merely looking, it involves noticing things" - Ned Smith The mission of the Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art is to honor the legacy of Ned Smith by merging the arts and natural world through education, exhibition, and experiences. Rooted in the scenic Susquehanna Valley of Central Pennsylvania, we strive to be the leading institution for the collection and dissemination of art and natural history knowledge, particularly when the two intersect and reinforce one another. We are the repository for the art, writings and other work of the late Ned Smith, from whose life the center takes its original inspiration. The center seeks to appeal to all ages, races and genders across Pennsylvania and beyond. Our goal is to be viewed as a vibrant cornerstone to the cultural, economic, social and environmental life of communities near and far.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

South Bend Museum of Art

120 S. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, South Bend, IN, US, 46601
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1947, the South Bend Museum of Art is the premier cultural destination for the community, providing insight into the art, history and culture of the region. SBMA celebrates 75 years in 2022, with a new outlook for growth, and a refreshed vision for the future. Conceived by a local teacher, Carlotta Banta in her bequest to the city, the South Bend Art Association was created through efforts of local leaders and originally established in the carriage house of the Studebaker mansion. The founding collection of works by Indiana artists was donated by Mr. and Mrs. E. M. Morris. In the early 1970s, the museum, the city, and the arts council combined efforts to create the new Century Center on the banks of the St. Joseph River in downtown South Bend. SBMA occupies 6000 square feet on three levels in the northern wing of the building. The reinvisioned SBMA was accredited in 1987 by the American Alliance of Museums; that accreditation was renewed in 1999 and 2011. SBMA is a world-class arts institution with deep roots in the community through exhibitions, programs, and studio arts classes. The brand identity tagline of See, Belong, Make, Art (SBMA) reinforces the museum’s commitment to displaying and creating art with inclusiveness and accessibility as cornerstones of its work. The collection is rich in regional art, from the nineteenth century to the present, and has long engaged with contemporary artists from Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Missouri. The museum puts on several major exhibitions every year. SBMA has fostered generations of emerging and established artists of all ages in it's art studios for ceramic, weaving, painting, photography and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-bend-museum-of-art.jpeg
South Bend Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Bend Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Bend Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Bend Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Bend Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-bend-museum-of-art.jpeg
South Bend Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company and South Bend Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, South Bend Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company.

In the current year, South Bend Museum of Art company and Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor South Bend Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor South Bend Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South Bend Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor South Bend Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X