Comparison Overview

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

VS

Ganna Walska Lotusland

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

176 Water Company Road, Millersburg, PA, 17061, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nedsmithcenter.org

"Seeing is more than merely looking, it involves noticing things" - Ned Smith The mission of the Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art is to honor the legacy of Ned Smith by merging the arts and natural world through education, exhibition, and experiences. Rooted in the scenic Susquehanna Valley of Central Pennsylvania, we strive to be the leading institution for the collection and dissemination of art and natural history knowledge, particularly when the two intersect and reinforce one another. We are the repository for the art, writings and other work of the late Ned Smith, from whose life the center takes its original inspiration. The center seeks to appeal to all ages, races and genders across Pennsylvania and beyond. Our goal is to be viewed as a vibrant cornerstone to the cultural, economic, social and environmental life of communities near and far.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ganna Walska Lotusland

undefined, Santa Barbara, California, 93108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lotusland.org

Lotusland is recognized as one of the most breathtaking public gardens in the world. The 37-acre Botanical Garden in Montecito is the former estate of Madame Ganna Walska, a celebrated opera diva who began her development of Lotusland’s enchanting, whimsical gardens and highly diverse plant collections at the age of 55, from 1943 until her death in 1984. In addition to being one of the most spectacular and unique gardens in the world, Lotusland has helped lead the sustainable horticulture movement in the Southern California, and serves as a repository for globally rare plants.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ganna-walska-lotusland.jpeg
Ganna Walska Lotusland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ganna Walska Lotusland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ganna Walska Lotusland in 2026.

Incident History — Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ganna Walska Lotusland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ganna Walska Lotusland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ganna-walska-lotusland.jpeg
Ganna Walska Lotusland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company and Ganna Walska Lotusland company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ganna Walska Lotusland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company.

In the current year, Ganna Walska Lotusland company and Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ganna Walska Lotusland company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ganna Walska Lotusland company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ganna Walska Lotusland company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Ganna Walska Lotusland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Ganna Walska Lotusland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ganna Walska Lotusland company employs more people globally than Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art nor Ganna Walska Lotusland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References