Comparison Overview

Neatsmith

VS

BRADLEY

Neatsmith

544 King's Road, London, SW10 0TX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Neatsmith creates and installs bespoke, premium storage solutions, with every wardrobe designed and crafted in London. Established over twenty years ago, we are a family-run business dedicated to combining innovative design, exceptional craftsmanship, and outstanding service. Our in-house team of designers and cabinet makers ensure every project meets the highest standards of quality and detail. With showrooms in Brentwood, Chelsea, Guildford, Hampstead, Hampton Hill, Hatch End, Tunbridge Wells, and soon Dubai, our experienced designers work closely with clients to deliver spaces that are both functional and beautifully made. From our carefully curated selection of materials, accessories, and finishes, we create truly individual designs, tailored to each client’s lifestyle. "We're dedicated to working on a very personal level with our clients to produce something of real quality which we feel proud to say is by Neatsmith." — Philipp Nagel, Director

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BRADLEY

351 Peachtree Hills Avenue Suite 133, Atlanta, GA, 30324, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

BRADLEY (www.bradleyusa.com) - headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia is an innovative, to-the-trade luxury furnishings company specializing in artisan-crafted, American-made furnishings, lighting and accessories. Distinguished by a range of materials and customized finishes—reclaimed wood, hand-forged metal, antiqued mirror, painted glass—BRADLEY is sold through major design centers and by design trade professionals around the world.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neatsmith.jpeg
Neatsmith
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradley.jpeg
BRADLEY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neatsmith
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BRADLEY
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neatsmith in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BRADLEY in 2025.

Incident History — Neatsmith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neatsmith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BRADLEY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BRADLEY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neatsmith.jpeg
Neatsmith
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradley.jpeg
BRADLEY
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Neatsmith company and BRADLEY company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BRADLEY company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neatsmith company.

In the current year, BRADLEY company and Neatsmith company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BRADLEY company nor Neatsmith company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BRADLEY company nor Neatsmith company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BRADLEY company nor Neatsmith company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neatsmith company nor BRADLEY company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Neatsmith company nor BRADLEY company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neatsmith company employs more people globally than BRADLEY company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neatsmith nor BRADLEY holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.