Comparison Overview

NCI

VS

Editorial Office Ltd

NCI

2 Sun Court, NW, Norcross, 30092, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Network Communications, Inc. (NCI) provides lead generation, advertising, and Internet marketing solutions to the multifamily industry. We utilize prospect-focused distribution, social media and online franchises, industry events, and content marketing strategies to provide high-quality and measurable marketing solutions. Our products help our advertisers connect with their prospective customers at key decision points in their buying processes. We utilize multiple formats and channels including digital products, social media, printed magazines, promotional materials, and mobile applications. Consumers find our advertisers whether they are shopping at their favorite store, eating out at their favorite restaurant, or surfing the Internet at home. Headquartered in Norcross, GA, we proudly serve more than 20,000 advertisers and generate more than 12 million actionable leads every year.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1,208
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Editorial Office Ltd

BASINGSTOKE, RG25 , GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

With a wealth of expertise across a broad range of journals and scholarly platforms, Editorial Office provides exceptional peer review services to the publishing community. We manage all aspects of the peer review process, including email management, reports, system audits and meeting management. Our experienced and flexible editorial assistants provide both short term (e.g. maternity leave or holiday cover) and long term partnerships. Proven to seamlessly integrate into any editorial workflow we can cost effectively increase your journal resourcing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nci.jpeg
NCI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-office-ltd.jpeg
Editorial Office Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NCI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Editorial Office Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCI in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editorial Office Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — NCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Editorial Office Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editorial Office Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nci.jpeg
NCI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-office-ltd.jpeg
Editorial Office Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NCI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Editorial Office Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Editorial Office Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NCI company.

In the current year, Editorial Office Ltd company and NCI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Editorial Office Ltd company nor NCI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Editorial Office Ltd company nor NCI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Editorial Office Ltd company nor NCI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NCI company nor Editorial Office Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NCI company nor Editorial Office Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NCI company employs more people globally than Editorial Office Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NCI nor Editorial Office Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.