Comparison Overview

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault

VS

Texas Center for Justice and Equity

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault

811 Spring Forest Road, Raleigh, nc, 27609, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault is the sole statewide expertise working to end sexual violence and human trafficking through education, advocacy, and legislation. NCCASA provides prevention education, intervention resources and public policy to end all forms of sexual assault. Our dedicated staff works with over 70 rape crisis centers across the state in addition to the military, law enforcement, medical professionals, college campuses, and attorneys to create a coordinated community response to sexual assault

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Texas Center for Justice and Equity

1714 Fortview Road, Austin, TX, 78704, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

TCJE advances solutions and builds coalitions to end mass incarceration and foster safer Texas communities. Our three, often-intersecting goals are as follows: * Reverse the pipeline that pushes people into the justice system. We are fighting to reduce the number of people entering the system, including through deflection and restorative strategies. * Shrink the current justice system and its impact. We are fighting to reduce the number of people under correctional control (those who are incarcerated, or on probation or parole), as well as the number of people presently impacted by the harsh, long-term consequences of a conviction. * Prioritize approaches outside the justice system. We are fighting to shift investments away from the justice system and towards community wellness: programs and services that can help people address their needs – like substance use disorder, mental health problems, and past trauma. Building local capacity to address drug and behavioral issues will make communities safer.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nccasa.jpeg
North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texascjc.jpeg
Texas Center for Justice and Equity
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Center for Justice and Equity
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Center for Justice and Equity in 2025.

Incident History — North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Center for Justice and Equity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Center for Justice and Equity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nccasa.jpeg
North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texascjc.jpeg
Texas Center for Justice and Equity
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Center for Justice and Equity company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Texas Center for Justice and Equity company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company.

In the current year, Texas Center for Justice and Equity company and North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Center for Justice and Equity company nor North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Texas Center for Justice and Equity company nor North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Texas Center for Justice and Equity company nor North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault company employs more people globally than Texas Center for Justice and Equity company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault nor Texas Center for Justice and Equity holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H