Comparison Overview

Navitor Inc

VS

BCM Inks

Navitor Inc

1625 Roe Crest Drive, North Mankato, MN, 56003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Navitor custom print business products are available for purchase through graphic designers, print brokers, marketing consultants, local print shops, advertising agencies and promotional products distributors across North America. Navitor is an online printing company that provides a wide variety of printed products and services for print resellers. Our depth in capabilities of printing craftsmanship, printing equipment and over 60 years experience support your digital print needs or traditional printing jobs. Navitor is a G7 Master Printer. G7 by IDEAlliance insures that the printer facility conforms to and uses Proof-to-Print Processes to produce a close visual color match from proof to print. Read our blog http://www.navitor.com/blog/

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 372
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

BCM Inks

161 Commerce Blvd, Loveland, Ohio, 45242, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Since its inception in the United States in 1988, BCM Inks has been committed to improving the corrugated industry’s direct print capabilities through innovative and environmentally sensitive products, superior technical expertise, and technological advancement. BCM Inks works closely with educators and industry to further the advancement of value-added corrugated postprint. BCM Inks has achieved ISO 9001/2015 certification, is a Sony “Green Partner”, and is an innovator in the development of enhanced ink blending/color management systems.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcm-inks.jpeg
BCM Inks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Navitor Inc
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BCM Inks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Navitor Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCM Inks in 2025.

Incident History — Navitor Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navitor Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BCM Inks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCM Inks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/navitor-inc.jpeg
Navitor Inc
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcm-inks.jpeg
BCM Inks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Navitor Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BCM Inks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Navitor Inc company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BCM Inks company has not reported any.

In the current year, BCM Inks company and Navitor Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BCM Inks company nor Navitor Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Navitor Inc company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other BCM Inks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BCM Inks company nor Navitor Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Navitor Inc company nor BCM Inks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Navitor Inc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BCM Inks company.

Navitor Inc company employs more people globally than BCM Inks company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Navitor Inc nor BCM Inks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N