Comparison Overview

Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport

VS

U.S. Air Force Reserve

Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport

1176 Howell St., Newport, RI, US, 02841-1708
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Mission: The Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport provides research, development, test and evaluation, engineering, analysis, and assessment, and fleet support capabilities for submarines, autonomous underwater systems, and offensive and defensive undersea weapon systems, and stewards existing and emerging technologies in support of undersea warfare. Executes other responsibilities as assigned by the commander, Naval Undersea Warfare Center. Vision: Undersea Superiority: today and tomorrow

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 2,865
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

U.S. Air Force Reserve

180 Page Road, Bldg 208, Robins AFB, GA, US, 31098
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Air Force Reserve is an integral component of our Nation's air defense and military support network. Reservists bring knowledge, skills and expertise from their civilian experiences to support critical missions and training around the globe, while working alongside their Active Duty Air Force members. The Reserve provides the opportunity to live where you serve or serve where you live, while excelling at your civilian career, furthering your education, and serving your country! Call 800-257-1212 or download the AIM HIGH app to learn more about Air Force Reserve opportunities near you.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 19,033
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airforcereserverecruiting.jpeg
U.S. Air Force Reserve
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Air Force Reserve
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Air Force Reserve in 2025.

Incident History — Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Air Force Reserve (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Air Force Reserve cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naval-undersea-warfare-center-newport.jpeg
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airforcereserverecruiting.jpeg
U.S. Air Force Reserve
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

U.S. Air Force Reserve company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported any.

In the current year, U.S. Air Force Reserve company and Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve company nor Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve company nor Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company nor U.S. Air Force Reserve company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Air Force Reserve company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company.

U.S. Air Force Reserve company employs more people globally than Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport nor U.S. Air Force Reserve holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H