Comparison Overview

NAVAL GROUP

VS

Leidos

NAVAL GROUP

40-42 rue du docteur FInlay, None, Paris cedex 15, None, FR, 75732
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

As an international naval defence player, Naval Group is a partner for countries seeking to maintain control of their maritime sovereignty. Naval Group develops innovative solutions to meet its customers’ requirements. The group is present throughout the entire life cycle of vessels. It designs, produces, equips, integrates, supports and upgrades submarines and surface ships, as well as their systems and equipment, right up to the final phases of deconstruction and dismantling. Naval Group’s unique know-how in autonomous systems, underwater weapons and drones place it in pole position to become European leader in the sector. As a high-tech company, it draws on its outstanding expertise, unique design and production resources and ability to establish strategic partnerships, in particular within the framework of transfers of technology. It also provides shipyard and naval base services. Ever mindful of the issues concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR), Naval Group is a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact. Located on five continents, the group generates revenue of 4.355 billion euros and has 16,722 employees (Full-Time Equivalent average annual workforce - figures as on 31 December 2024).

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,935
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Leidos

1750 Presidents St, Reston, Virginia, US, 20190
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Leidos is a Fortune 500® innovation company rapidly addressing the world’s most vexing challenges in national security and health. The company's global workforce of 48,000 collaborates to create smarter technology solutions for customers in heavily regulated industries. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, Leidos reported annual revenues of approximately $15.4 billion for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2023. Leidos was cited for the meaningful work employees perform that is challenging, impactful, and aligned with our customers’ missions as reasons professionals want to work and stay at our company. Leidos has also been named to lists including Forbes’ Best Employers for Diversity, Forbes’ America’s Best Employers for Women, Military Times Best for Vets Employers, and Ethisphere Institute’s World's Most Ethical Companies®. Employees enjoy career enrichment opportunities available through mobility and development and experience rewarding relationships with supportive supervisors and talented colleagues and customers. Employees appreciate our flexible work environment, allowing for and encouraging a true work-life balance. Our professionals are also excited about our Employee Resource Groups, like the Collaborative Outreach with Remote and Embedded Employees (CORE), which strives to create an environment where every employee, regardless of location, feels fully engaged as a valued employee of Leidos. Your most important work is ahead, visit careers.leidos.com for our latest opportunities.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 35,609
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leidos.jpeg
Leidos
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NAVAL GROUP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Leidos
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NAVAL GROUP has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leidos in 2025.

Incident History — NAVAL GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAVAL GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Leidos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leidos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naval-group.jpeg
NAVAL GROUP
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leidos.jpeg
Leidos
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Leidos company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NAVAL GROUP company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Leidos company.

In the current year, NAVAL GROUP company has reported more cyber incidents than Leidos company.

Neither Leidos company nor NAVAL GROUP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Leidos company and NAVAL GROUP company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

NAVAL GROUP company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Leidos company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NAVAL GROUP company nor Leidos company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Leidos company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NAVAL GROUP company.

Leidos company employs more people globally than NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor Leidos holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N