Comparison Overview
NAVAL GROUP
NAVAL GROUP
40-42 rue du docteur FInlay, Paris cedex 15, 75732, FR
Last Update: 30/09/2026
As an international naval defence player, Naval Group is a partner for countries seeking to maintain control of their maritime sovereignty. Naval Group develops innovative solutions to meet its customers’ requirements. The group is present throughout the entire life cyc...
Leidos
1750 Presidents St, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 29/09/2026
Leidos is a Fortune 500® innovation company rapidly addressing the world’s most vexing challenges in national security and health. The company's global workforce of 48,000 collaborates to create smarter technology solutions for customers in heavily regulated industries....
Compliance Ranges Comparison
NAVAL GROUP
Leidos
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
NAVAL GROUP has 54.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Leidos in 2026.
Incident History - NAVAL GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NAVAL GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Leidos (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Leidos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
NAVAL GROUP
Leidos
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.