Comparison Overview

Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise

VS

Gamesys

Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise

249 East NM State Highway 118, Church Rock, New Mexico, 87311, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Navajo Gaming, a Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise (NNGE). We invite you to explore our website to learn more about our mission, exciting properties, where we’re located, access articles and press releases about us in the news, career opportunities and more. Each casino property offers an exciting gaming experience, as well as unique dining opportunities and live entertainment. In addition, Twin Arrows offers a four-diamond resort and award-winning restaurants. Our properties in Arizona and New Mexico showcase the rich Navajo spirit through art, architecture, hospitality and cuisine. Since its inception in 2004, NNGE has created over one thousand jobs with a focus on hiring and training Navajos and has distributed millions of dollars in revenue to both the Nation and State governments. We are proud of each employee that works tirelessly to create an unforgettable experience for guests. We are also grateful for our board, Navajo Nation government, loyal patrons and surrounding communities that have supported us and our growth.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 262
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gamesys

10 Piccadilly, London, undefined, W1J 0DD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gamesys is a Bally’s Corporation company and forms part of one of the world’s leading entertainment providers, with tens of millions of players and thousands of employees across the globe.    Take a look at our Gamesys brands & sites - Virgin, Jackpotjoy, Vera&John, Monopoly - they’re some of the best-known names in our industry, and we’re proud of it! We make our mark by being ourselves and keeping our players and our team at the heart of everything we do. And above all else, we want to have fun, making fun!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 322
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamesys.jpeg
Gamesys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gamesys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gamesys in 2025.

Incident History — Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gamesys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gamesys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/navajo-nation-gaming-enterprise.jpeg
Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamesys.jpeg
Gamesys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company and Gamesys company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gamesys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company.

In the current year, Gamesys company and Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gamesys company nor Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gamesys company nor Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gamesys company nor Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company nor Gamesys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gamesys company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company.

Gamesys company employs more people globally than Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise nor Gamesys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H