Comparison Overview

Nautical Archaeology Society

VS

Historic Royal Palaces

Nautical Archaeology Society

Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Rd, Portsmouth, PO4 9LD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The NAS was formed to further interest in our underwater cultural heritage. We are dedicated to advancing education in nautical archaeology at all levels from the general public to professionals in the sector. To this end we: run an accredited training programme, publish a peer-reviewed journal; organise fieldwork and an annual conference to assist our members in improving their skills in recording, conservation and reporting of archaeology. We are a registered charity based in the United Kingdom, but with strong links to like-minded organisations around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Historic Royal Palaces

East Molesey, Surrey, GB, KT8 9AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are the charity who love and look after Hampton Court Palace, Kensington Palace, Tower of London, the Banqueting House, Kew Palace, and Hillsborough Castle and Gardens. The palaces are the setting for the stories that shape us all, and we’re bringing them to people in ways that mean more to them. We want everyone to find themselves in the spaces and stories we share. The palaces are owned by The King on behalf of the nation. As an independent charity, we raise all our own funds and depend on the support of our visitors, members, donors, sponsors and volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 936
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nautical-archaeology-society-the-.jpeg
Nautical Archaeology Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-royal-palaces.jpeg
Historic Royal Palaces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nautical Archaeology Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Royal Palaces
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nautical Archaeology Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Royal Palaces in 2025.

Incident History — Nautical Archaeology Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nautical Archaeology Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Royal Palaces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Royal Palaces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nautical-archaeology-society-the-.jpeg
Nautical Archaeology Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-royal-palaces.jpeg
Historic Royal Palaces
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Royal Palaces company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nautical Archaeology Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic Royal Palaces company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nautical Archaeology Society company.

In the current year, Historic Royal Palaces company and Nautical Archaeology Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Nautical Archaeology Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Nautical Archaeology Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Royal Palaces company nor Nautical Archaeology Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society company nor Historic Royal Palaces company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society company nor Historic Royal Palaces company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Royal Palaces company employs more people globally than Nautical Archaeology Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nautical Archaeology Society nor Historic Royal Palaces holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X