Comparison Overview

NatWest Group

VS

Desjardins

NatWest Group

175 Glasgow Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH12 9BH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Our ambition is simple: to succeed with our customers. Because when they succeed, so do we. Whether it’s buying a home, investing for tomorrow, growing a business, or helping our customers to build a more sustainable future, we can succeed with customers by understanding their world and what matters to them: their priorities, aspirations, and the challenges they face. We want to help them to navigate change and make progress towards their goals with the right services and expertise. At the same time, we are becoming a simpler, more integrated and technology-driven NatWest Group: able to anticipate, understand and respond to customers’ changing needs and expectations faster and more effectively, and with greater impact. With a range of businesses across the organisation, an inclusive culture and flexible working opportunities, there’s nothing to stop you realising your potential with us at NatWest Group.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 41,331
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Desjardins

100, rue des Commandeurs, Lévis, G6V 7N5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Desjardins Group is the largest cooperative financial group in North America and the fifth largest cooperative financial group in the world, with assets of $435.8 billion as at March 31, 2024. It was named one of Canada's Best Employers by Forbes magazine and by Mediacorp. To meet the diverse needs of its members and clients, Desjardins offers a full range of products and services to individuals and businesses through its extensive distribution network, online platforms and subsidiaries across Canada. Ranked among the world's strongest banks according to The Banker magazine, Desjardins has some of the highest capital ratios and credit ratings in the industry and the first according to Bloomberg News.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 43,144
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natwest-group.jpeg
NatWest Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/desjardins.jpeg
Desjardins
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NatWest Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Desjardins
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NatWest Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Desjardins in 2025.

Incident History — NatWest Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NatWest Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Desjardins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Desjardins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natwest-group.jpeg
NatWest Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/desjardins.jpeg
Desjardins
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NatWest Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Desjardins company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Desjardins company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NatWest Group company.

In the current year, Desjardins company and NatWest Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Desjardins company nor NatWest Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Desjardins company nor NatWest Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Desjardins company nor NatWest Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NatWest Group company nor Desjardins company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NatWest Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Desjardins company.

Desjardins company employs more people globally than NatWest Group company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor Desjardins holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H