Comparison Overview

Natural History Museum

VS

Sigal Music Museum

Natural History Museum

Cromwell Road, London, England, SW7 5BD, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nhm.ac.uk

The Natural History Museum is a world-class visitor attraction and leading science research centre. We use the Museum's unique collections and our unrivalled expertise to tackle the biggest challenges facing the world today. More than 80 million objects spanning billions of years are in our care. We welcome more than five million visitors to our galleries annually, and 16 million visitors to our websites. Today the Museum is more relevant and influential than ever. By attracting people from a range of backgrounds to work for us, we can continue to look at the world with fresh eyes. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jobs  Stay up to date with Museum news and events on our website: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/ And on social media: https://facebook.com/naturalhistorymuseum  https://twitter.com/NHM_London https://instagram/natural_history_museum  https://www.tiktok.com/@its_nhm https://youtube.com/naturalhistorymuseum

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,656
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sigal Music Museum

516 Buncombe St, None, Greenville, South Carolina, US, 29601
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://sigalmusicmuseum.org/

Sigal Music Museum features one of the largest collections of historically significant instruments in the United States. Resonating with sights, sounds, opportunities, and discovery, Sigal Music Museum provides a total musical immersion experience designed to delight and inspire music lovers of all ages. Our visitors include music aficionados, students, musicians, scholars, and tourists from across the country and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natural-history-museum.jpeg
Natural History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigal-music-museum.jpeg
Sigal Music Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Natural History Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sigal Music Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural History Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sigal Music Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Natural History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sigal Music Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sigal Music Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natural-history-museum.jpeg
Natural History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigal-music-museum.jpeg
Sigal Music Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natural History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sigal Music Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sigal Music Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Natural History Museum company.

In the current year, Sigal Music Museum company and Natural History Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Natural History Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Natural History Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Natural History Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Natural History Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sigal Music Museum company.

Natural History Museum company employs more people globally than Sigal Music Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Natural History Museum nor Sigal Music Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References