Comparison Overview

Native Sons

VS

Rinella Printers

Native Sons

1519 Executive Ave, Myrtle Beach, SC, 29577, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Native Sons Screen Print and Embroidery started out in 1984 as a group of young Myrtle Beach natives whose goal was simple; to have fun and promote the beach lifestyle. From this genuine premise, a company was born that continues to share what it means to live on the Grand Strand. Today, Native Sons has evolved into one of the largest screen printing and embroidery companies on the East Coast with both local and national clients. Native Sons'​ success is a product of hard work, and a passion for what we do.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rinella Printers

1004 Sargent Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3G 2V3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We help businesses create professional print assets like business stationery, direct mail, signage and marketing material, so you can: - Strengthen your unique brand identity, - Stand out in the marketplace, - Gain customers’ trust, and - Grow your business. Whether you want to think big or keep it simple, we can help bring your ideas to life. Are you ready to take your print marketing to the next level? Call us today or visit our website to get a personalized quote! 204-233-7835 rinellaprint.ca

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/native-sons.jpeg
Native Sons
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rinella-printers.jpeg
Rinella Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Native Sons
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rinella Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Native Sons in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rinella Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Native Sons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Native Sons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rinella Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rinella Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/native-sons.jpeg
Native Sons
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rinella-printers.jpeg
Rinella Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Native Sons company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rinella Printers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rinella Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Native Sons company.

In the current year, Rinella Printers company and Native Sons company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rinella Printers company nor Native Sons company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rinella Printers company nor Native Sons company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rinella Printers company nor Native Sons company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Native Sons company nor Rinella Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Native Sons company nor Rinella Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Native Sons company employs more people globally than Rinella Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Native Sons nor Rinella Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N