Comparison Overview

Nationalmuseet

VS

Kröller-Müller Museum

Nationalmuseet

Copenhagen K, 1220, DK
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://natmus.dk

Nationalmuseet er Danmarks statslige og største kulturhistoriske museum. Museet omfatter en række besøgssteder udover udstillingerne i Prinsens Palæ i København: Frilandsmuseet, Kongernes Jelling, Frøslevlejrens Museum, Trelleborg, Krigsmuseet, Liselund, Kommandørgården, Frihedsmuseet, Christiansborg Slot, Kronborg Slot og Musikmuseet. Nationalmuseet udfører en række centrale opgaver på landsplan inden for især følgende områder: arkæologi, etnologi, numismatik, etnografi, naturvidenskab, bevaring, formidling, rådgivning vedrørende kirkerestaurering, behandling af danefæ og udlån af museets genstande.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 557
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kröller-Müller Museum

Houtkampweg 6, Otterlo, undefined, 6731AW, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.krollermuller.nl

At the Kröller-Müller Museum, you will find the world’s finest Vincent van Gogh collection and enjoy masterpieces by modern masters such as Claude Monet, Georges Seurat, Pablo Picasso and Piet Mondriaan. The museum is a treasure trove of De Stijl and futurism, and will surprise you with presentations of contemporary artists. In the sculpture garden, you will stroll past works by Barbara Hepworth, Jean Dubuffet, Marta Pan and others. For architecture enthusiasts we have the museum buildings by Henry van de Velde and Wim Quist, the Gerrit Rietveld pavilion and Aldo van Eyck pavilion in the sculpture garden. Its location in the heart of the Veluwe and the unique combination of art and nature make the Kröller-Müller a place to enjoy and unwind.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalmuseet.jpeg
Nationalmuseet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kr-ller-m-ller-museum.jpeg
Kröller-Müller Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nationalmuseet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kröller-Müller Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nationalmuseet in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kröller-Müller Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Nationalmuseet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nationalmuseet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kröller-Müller Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kröller-Müller Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalmuseet.jpeg
Nationalmuseet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kr-ller-m-ller-museum.jpeg
Kröller-Müller Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nationalmuseet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kröller-Müller Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kröller-Müller Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nationalmuseet company.

In the current year, Kröller-Müller Museum company and Nationalmuseet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kröller-Müller Museum company nor Nationalmuseet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kröller-Müller Museum company nor Nationalmuseet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kröller-Müller Museum company nor Nationalmuseet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nationalmuseet company nor Kröller-Müller Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nationalmuseet company nor Kröller-Müller Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nationalmuseet company employs more people globally than Kröller-Müller Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nationalmuseet nor Kröller-Müller Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References