Comparison Overview

National Custom Labels

VS

AA Blueprint Co., Inc

National Custom Labels

18 South Murphy Ave, Brazil, Indiana, 47834, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://nationalcustomlabels.com

National Printing was founded in Los Angeles in 1963 supplying printed tapes to the aerospace industry. As the computer age began, NPC was one of the first companies to develop 'pin-feed'​ labels to run on the new computer printers. In 1972, National expanded its manufacturing Indiana and joined the NBFA - a trade association of Print Professionals across the country. By the 1980's, National was adhesive coating its own materials and developing labels to run through the new emerging technology of Laser Printers. This innovative and experimental attitude has enabled us to continue to provide custom Labels & Tags to meet our customers demands. We are guided by trusting relationships, an open and honest attitude and respect for our employees and customers. Built on Relationships!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AA Blueprint Co., Inc

2757 Gilchrist Road, Akron, Ohio, US, 44305
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aablueprint.com

Over 40 years, and with 4 generations, providing quality printing services in Northeast Ohio. We are the largest independent printer, and the only FBE printer, in the Akron/Cleveland area. Our state-of-the-art equipment, comprehensive reprographic services, and competent staff provide only the highest quality products with the fastest possible turnaround. Available services between our two offices includes, large and small format printing in black & white or color [including offset], archival photographic reproductions, microfilming, document and aperture card scanning to electronic format, and sells of computers, plotters, printers and scanners, all serviced by our factory trained technicians. And we also offer a variety of Computer-Aided-Design services including drawing conversion and plotting.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalcustomlabels.jpeg
National Custom Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aa-blueprint-co-inc.jpeg
AA Blueprint Co., Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Custom Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AA Blueprint Co., Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Custom Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AA Blueprint Co., Inc in 2025.

Incident History — National Custom Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Custom Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AA Blueprint Co., Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AA Blueprint Co., Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalcustomlabels.jpeg
National Custom Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aa-blueprint-co-inc.jpeg
AA Blueprint Co., Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Custom Labels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AA Blueprint Co., Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AA Blueprint Co., Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Custom Labels company.

In the current year, AA Blueprint Co., Inc company and National Custom Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AA Blueprint Co., Inc company nor National Custom Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AA Blueprint Co., Inc company nor National Custom Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AA Blueprint Co., Inc company nor National Custom Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Custom Labels company employs more people globally than AA Blueprint Co., Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Custom Labels nor AA Blueprint Co., Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References